Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891313›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2025

Predicting survival in malignant glioma using artificial intelligence.

Wireko Andrew Awuah, Adam Ben-Jaafar, Subham Roy, Princess Afia Nkrumah-Boateng, Joecelyn Kirani Tan, Toufik Abdul-Rahman, Oday Atallah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biological tumor volume predicts survival in recurrent High-Grade glioma: A multiparametric [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wireko Andrew Awuah *Department of Research, Toufik's World Medical Association, Sumy, Ukraine. andyvans36@yahoo.com.
Adam Ben-Jaafar *School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Subham RoyHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
Princess Afia Nkrumah-BoatengUniversity of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.
Joecelyn Kirani TanFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Toufik Abdul-RahmanDepartment of Research, Toufik's World Medical Association, Sumy, Ukraine.
Oday AtallahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Carl Von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant gliomas, including glioblastoma, are amongst the most aggressive primary brain tumours, characterised by rapid progression and a poor prognosis. Survival analysis is an essential aspect of glioma management and research, as most studies use time-to-event outcomes to assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as key measures to evaluate patients. However, predicting survival using traditional methods such as the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the Cox Proportional Hazards (CPH) model has faced many challenges and inaccuracies. Recently, advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have enabled significant improvements in survival prediction for glioma patients by integrating multimodal data such as imaging, clinical parameters and molecular biomarkers. This study highlights the comparative effectiveness of imaging-based, non-imaging and combined AI models. Imaging models excel at identifying tumour-specific features through radiomics, achieving high predictive accuracy. Non-imaging approaches also excel in utilising clinical and genetic data to provide complementary insights, whilst combined methods integrate multiple data modalities and have the greatest potential for accurate survival prediction. Limitations include data heterogeneity, interpretability challenges and computational demands, particularly in resource-limited settings. Solutions such as federated learning, lightweight AI models and explainable AI frameworks are proposed to overcome these barriers. Ultimately, the integration of advanced AI techniques promises to transform glioma management by enabling personalised treatment strategies and improved prognostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrain NeoplasmsGliomaDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningPrognosisArtificial intelligence (AI)Deep learning (DL)Machine learning (ML)Malignant gliomaSurvival prediction approaches

Identifiers

PMID39891313
PMCPMC11783879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.