ReviewEuropean journal of medical research2025
Predicting survival in malignant glioma using artificial intelligence.
Review in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Endovascular Drug Delivery into the Therapeutic Landscape of Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2026Review
- Assessing the prognostic value of SIL1 in pan-cancer cohorts and its practical application as a biomarker in glioma practice.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A Comprehensive Cross-Cancer Translational Readiness Analysis Across 18 Malignancies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Biological tumor volume predicts survival in recurrent High-Grade glioma: A multiparametric [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Automated feature learning and survival prognostication in grade 4 glioma using supervised machine learning models.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- CRISPR and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroregeneration: Closed-Loop Strategies for Precision Medicine, Spinal Cord Repair, and Adaptive Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advanced MRI, Radiomics and Radiogenomics in Unravelling Incidental Glioma Grading and Genetic Status: Where Are We?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Protein lactylation and immunotherapy in gliomas: A novel regulatory axis in tumor metabolism (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
- Glioma-Associated Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells Derived Exosomal miR-191 Promotes the Proneural-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Glioblastoma Cells via PTEN/PI3K/AKT Signaling.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning model predicts response to adjuvant therapy after radical cystectomy in bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-assisted prognosis prediction and surgical decision-making for glioblastoma: perceived benefits and concerns of patients, caregivers, and neurosurgeons.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: Current status and possibilities (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant gliomas, including glioblastoma, are amongst the most aggressive primary brain tumours, characterised by rapid progression and a poor prognosis. Survival analysis is an essential aspect of glioma management and research, as most studies use time-to-event outcomes to assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as key measures to evaluate patients. However, predicting survival using traditional methods such as the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the Cox Proportional Hazards (CPH) model has faced many challenges and inaccuracies. Recently, advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have enabled significant improvements in survival prediction for glioma patients by integrating multimodal data such as imaging, clinical parameters and molecular biomarkers. This study highlights the comparative effectiveness of imaging-based, non-imaging and combined AI models. Imaging models excel at identifying tumour-specific features through radiomics, achieving high predictive accuracy. Non-imaging approaches also excel in utilising clinical and genetic data to provide complementary insights, whilst combined methods integrate multiple data modalities and have the greatest potential for accurate survival prediction. Limitations include data heterogeneity, interpretability challenges and computational demands, particularly in resource-limited settings. Solutions such as federated learning, lightweight AI models and explainable AI frameworks are proposed to overcome these barriers. Ultimately, the integration of advanced AI techniques promises to transform glioma management by enabling personalised treatment strategies and improved prognostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.