ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Justification of Body Mass Index cutoffs for hip and knee joint arthroplasty among California orthopedic surgeons.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Persistent use of body mass index policies as a barrier to surgery: Prevalence and analysis of policies across England in 2025.Journal of health services research & policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany orthopedic surgeons choose not to perform joint arthroplasty on patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 35 or above, citing poorer outcomes and increased procedure risk. Identifying and addressing factors surgeons use to determine procedure BMI cutoffs are necessary to increase access to orthopaedic care for this growing patient population. This will help reduce healthcare disparities while also identifying clinical facilities, equipment, training, and procedures that require improvements to accommodate larger individuals.
methodsOrthopaedic surgeons were surveyed to identify surgeon-specific BMI cutoffs for hip and knee arthroplasty. The survey was circulated within the California Orthopaedic Association (COA) report during March 2023. Questions aimed to identify BMI cutoffs and justifications such as infection risk, co-morbidities, inadequate equipment, and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines. Data on decision making about BMI cutoffs and exceptions were also collected.
results75% of respondents use BMI cutoffs for hip and knee arthroplasty. 91% of respondents indicated they are either wholly or partially responsible for setting procedure BMI cutoffs. Mean hip and knee arthroplasty BMI cutoffs were 40.5 and 41, respectively. Four categories for BMI cutoff justifications were identified: (1) risk of complications; (2) surgery logistics; (3) concerns about facilities or resources; and (4) surgeon perception.
conclusionsBMI-based justifications for denial of care define key addressable areas of improvement that can increase access to care for life-changing orthopaedic surgeries such as THA and TKA. Insight from the queried surgeons will help drive future research areas to address this need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.