Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891283›Full record

ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2025

A novel ViT-BILSTM model for physical activity intensity classification in adults using gravity-based acceleration.

Lin Wang, Zizhang Luo, Tianle Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lin WangFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. lw679@exeter.ac.uk.
Zizhang LuoEngineering & Technology College, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 434023, China.
Tianle ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3DR, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study is to apply a novel hybrid framework incorporating a Vision Transformer (ViT) and bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model for classifying physical activity intensity (PAI) in adults using gravity-based acceleration. Additionally, it further investigates how PAI and temporal window (TW) impacts the model' s accuracy.

methodThis research used the Capture-24 dataset, consisting of raw accelerometer data from 151 participants aged 18 to 91. Gravity-based acceleration was utilised to generate images encoding various PAIs. These images were subsequently analysed using the ViT-BiLSTM model, with results presented in confusion matrices and compared with baseline models. The model's robustness was evaluated through temporal stability testing and examination of accuracy and loss curves.

resultThe ViT-BiLSTM model excelled in PAI classification task, achieving an overall accuracy of 98.5% ± 1.48% across five TWs-98.7% for 1s, 98.1% for 5s, 98.2% for 10s, 99% for 15s, and 98.65% for 30s of TW. The model consistently exhibited superior accuracy in predicting sedentary (98.9% ± 1%) compared to light physical activity (98.2% ± 2%) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (98.2% ± 3%). ANOVA showed no significant accuracy variation across PAIs (F = 2.18, p = 0.13) and TW (F = 0.52, p = 0.72). Accuracy and loss curves show the model consistently improves its performance across epochs, demonstrating its excellent robustness.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the ViT-BiLSTM model's efficacy in classifying PAI using gravity-based acceleration, with performance remaining consistent across diverse TWs and intensities. However, PAI and TW could result in slight variations in the model's performance. Future research should concern and investigate the impact of gravity-based acceleration on PAI thresholds, which may influence model's robustness and reliability.

Indexed as

Deep learningGeneralisationPhysical activity patternsRaw accelerometer dataVariation

Identifiers

PMID39891283
PMCPMC11786420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.