ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2025
A novel ViT-BILSTM model for physical activity intensity classification in adults using gravity-based acceleration.
Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine and Deep Learning for Detection of Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity From Accelerometer Data: Systematic Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- ViT-BiLSTM Multimodal Learning for Paediatric ADHD Recognition: Integrating Wearable Sensor Data with Clinical Profiles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study is to apply a novel hybrid framework incorporating a Vision Transformer (ViT) and bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model for classifying physical activity intensity (PAI) in adults using gravity-based acceleration. Additionally, it further investigates how PAI and temporal window (TW) impacts the model' s accuracy.
methodThis research used the Capture-24 dataset, consisting of raw accelerometer data from 151 participants aged 18 to 91. Gravity-based acceleration was utilised to generate images encoding various PAIs. These images were subsequently analysed using the ViT-BiLSTM model, with results presented in confusion matrices and compared with baseline models. The model's robustness was evaluated through temporal stability testing and examination of accuracy and loss curves.
resultThe ViT-BiLSTM model excelled in PAI classification task, achieving an overall accuracy of 98.5% ± 1.48% across five TWs-98.7% for 1s, 98.1% for 5s, 98.2% for 10s, 99% for 15s, and 98.65% for 30s of TW. The model consistently exhibited superior accuracy in predicting sedentary (98.9% ± 1%) compared to light physical activity (98.2% ± 2%) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (98.2% ± 3%). ANOVA showed no significant accuracy variation across PAIs (F = 2.18, p = 0.13) and TW (F = 0.52, p = 0.72). Accuracy and loss curves show the model consistently improves its performance across epochs, demonstrating its excellent robustness.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the ViT-BiLSTM model's efficacy in classifying PAI using gravity-based acceleration, with performance remaining consistent across diverse TWs and intensities. However, PAI and TW could result in slight variations in the model's performance. Future research should concern and investigate the impact of gravity-based acceleration on PAI thresholds, which may influence model's robustness and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.