Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891277›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2025

Study protocol: type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study of routine functional status screening in VA primary care.

Francesca M Nicosia, Kara Zamora, LauraEllen Ashcraft, Gregory Krautner, Marybeth Groot, Bruce Kinosian, Cathy C Schubert, Sumedha Chhatre, Helene Moriarty, Orna Intrator and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06404970 (A Partnered Evaluation to Improve Identification and Management of Functional Impairment and Frailty for Older Veterans in VA Primary Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06404970 narecruitingnot on this map

A Partnered Evaluation to Improve Identification and Management of Functional Impairment and Frailty for Older Veterans in VA Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2025 to 2026Enrolled10,000ConditionsFunctional Impairment, FrailtyArmsScreening intervention, Standard bundle of implementation strategies, Enhanced bundle of implementation strategies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Francesca M NicosiaCenter for Data to Discovery to Delivery Innovation (3DI), San Francisco Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kara ZamoraSan Francisco VA Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
LauraEllen AshcraftCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gregory KrautnerCentral Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care, District of Columbia, Washington, USA.
Marybeth GrootCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bruce KinosianCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cathy C SchubertCommunity, Home, and Geriatrics Service, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Sumedha ChhatreCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Helene MoriartyCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Orna IntratorGeriatrics & Extended Care Data & Analyses Center (GECDAC), Canandaigua VAMC, Canandaigua, NY, USA.
Andrea Wershof SchwartzNew England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Ariela R OrkabyNew England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Jason PriggeCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rebecca T BrownCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. rebecca.brown@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7483-4137

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alexander Keliimoeanu Smith · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
HSRD VA I50 HX003771NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281Quality Enhancement Research Initiative PEC-072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintaining functional status, defined as the ability to perform daily activities such as bathing, dressing, and preparing meals, is central to older adults' quality of life, health, and ability to remain independent. Identifying functional impairments - defined as having difficulty or needing help performing these activities - is essential for clinicians to provide optimal care to older adults, and on a population level, understanding function can help anticipate service needs. Yet uptake of standardized measurement of functional status into routine patient care has been slow and inconsistent due to the burden posed by current tools. The goal of the Patient-Aligned Care Team (PACT) Functional Status Screening Initiative is to implement and evaluate a patient-centered, low-burden intervention to improve identification and management of functional impairment among older veterans in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care settings.

methodsWe will conduct a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness cluster-randomized adaptive trial at 8 VHA sites using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to guide implementation and evaluation. During a Pre-Implementation phase, we will engage clinical partners and develop local adaptations to maximize intervention-setting fit. During an Implementation phase, we will launch a standard bundle of implementation strategies (coalition building, champions, technical assistance) and system-level audit and feedback, identify sites with low uptake, and randomize those sites to receive continued standard vs. enhanced strategies (standard strategies plus clinician-level audit and feedback). The primary implementation outcome is reach (proportion of eligible patients at each site who receive screening/assessment) and the primary effectiveness outcome is appropriate management of impairment (proportion of patients with identified impairments who receive related referrals). DISCUSSION: Implementing routine measurement of functional status in primary care has the potential to improve identification and management of functional impairment for older veterans. Improved management includes increasing access to services and supports for veterans and family caregivers, reducing potentially preventable acute care utilization, and allowing veterans to live in the least restrictive setting for as long as possible. Implementation will also provide data to inform the delivery of proactive interventions to prevent and delay development of functional impairment and improve quality of life, health, and independence.

trial registrationRegistered at ClinicalTrials.gov on May 7, 2024, at NCT06404970 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ). REPORTING GUIDELINES: Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (Additional file 1).

Indexed as

FrailtyFunctional statusGeriatricsImplementation SciencePrimary CareVeteransVeterans Health Administration

Identifiers

PMID39891277
PMCPMC11786338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.