ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
A modified non-contrast MRI in the preoperative examination of periacetabular osteotomy at 3.0T.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether the modified hip non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can replace the direct MRI hip arthrography (d-MRA) at 3.0T in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) preoperative examination, and also to assess the difference between these two methods. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study involved 35 patients (38 hips) with DDH who underwent periacetabular osteotomy, age 9-41 years old (mean age 25), 4 males (4 hips) and 34 females (34 hips). Each patient underwent both d-MRA and modified 3.0T non-contrast MRI examination of the hip joint. All patients underwent hip-preserving PAO surgery subsequently. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the joint injury examined by the two imaging methods.
resultsThe modified non-contrast MRI detected the labral injury with a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 75%, an accuracy of 92%, and a positive predictive value of 97%. Among the 38 hips, 10 hips had labral varus (i.e., inward deviation or angulation of the acetabular labrum) with an incidence rate of 26% (10/38), 9 hips had acetabular cysts (i.e., the fluid-filled sacs that develop in or around the acetabulum, the socket of the hip joint) with an incidence rate of 23% (9/38). One patient had both the labral cyst and acetabular cartilage injury, and two patients had labral cyst only (overall incidence rate of labral cyst 7% (3/38)). The results were comparable to those of d-MRA in the examination of cartilage injury, labral varus, acetabular cyst, and labral cyst.
conclusionFor preoperative hip-preserving surgery in DDH patients, the modified non-contrast MRI performed similarly to the d-MRA at 3.0T in diagnostic capabilities. The labral injury mostly occurs in the anterior upper quadrant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.