ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Towards unbiased skin cancer classification using deep feature fusion.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- OFS: on fused SAMI filtered handcraft and DSRSENet features for enhanced skin malignancy detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- An optimal graph convolutional vision neural network with explainable feature optimization for improved skin cancer detection.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- An explainable hybrid deep learning framework for precise skin lesion segmentation and multi-class classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Explainable AI-driven hybrid deep learning framework for accurate skin cancer diagnosis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper introduces SkinWiseNet (SWNet), a deep convolutional neural network designed for the detection and automatic classification of potentially malignant skin cancer conditions. SWNet optimizes feature extraction through multiple pathways, emphasizing network width augmentation to enhance efficiency. The proposed model addresses potential biases associated with skin conditions, particularly in individuals with darker skin tones or excessive hair, by incorporating feature fusion to assimilate insights from diverse datasets. Extensive experiments were conducted using publicly accessible datasets to evaluate SWNet's effectiveness.This study utilized four datasets-Mnist-HAM10000, ISIC2019, ISIC2020, and Melanoma Skin Cancer-comprising skin cancer images categorized into benign and malignant classes. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques, specifically Grad-CAM, were employed to enhance the interpretability of the model's decisions. Comparative analysis was performed with three pre-existing deep learning networks-EfficientNet, MobileNet, and Darknet. The results demonstrate SWNet's superiority, achieving an accuracy of 99.86% and an F1 score of 99.95%, underscoring its efficacy in gradient propagation and feature capture across various levels. This research highlights the significant potential of SWNet in advancing skin cancer detection and classification, providing a robust tool for accurate and early diagnosis. The integration of feature fusion enhances accuracy and mitigates biases associated with hair and skin tones. The outcomes of this study contribute to improved patient outcomes and healthcare practices, showcasing SWNet's exceptional capabilities in skin cancer detection and classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.