ArticleBMC health services research2025
Challenges in the transition between medical and vocational rehabilitation: a qualitative focus group study with service providers in Germany.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The transition from medical to vocational rehabilitation in Germany: an exploratory mixed methods study on rehabilitants' experiences.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRehabilitation aims to empower people to cope with their chronic conditions, to ensure societal and vocational participation and to prevent health-related early retirement. In Germany, medical and vocational rehabilitation are unconnected services. Expenditures on health-related early retirement in Germany rise while expenditures on vocational rehabilitation do not. Since the use of rehabilitation services often depends on the transition between services, the present study aims to shed light on barriers and facilitators for the transition between medical and vocational rehabilitation from the perspective of service providers working in different institutions.
methodsIn this sub-study we made use of a qualitative approach and conducted semi-structured focus groups with service providers, namely employees of rehabilitation institutions which we analyzed using Qualitative Content analysis and an inductive-deductive Coding System.
resultsTwenty-four employees of rehabilitation institutions participated in five different focus groups. Especially the pension funds as institutions and medical rehabilitation clinics' employees of different professions are considered to be relevant professional actors to ensure the continuity of care between medical and vocational rehabilitation. Facilitating and hindering factors include the labour market situation, the Covid-19-pandemic, feedback for employees, an interdisciplinary assessment, different time-related aspects as well as individual factors such as the rehabilitants' diagnoses.
conclusionThe findings are largely in line with previous research and point to the difficulty and importance of continuity of care between different rehabilitation services as well as the varying agency and responsibility attributed to different actors. The rehabilitation employees' view will later be integrated with the perspective of the rehabilitants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.