Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891183›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Evolutionary game model for the behavior of private sectors in elderly healthcare public-private partnership under the condition of information asymmetry.

Xianghua Yue, Shahzad Khan Durrani, Runfa Li, Wenling Liu, Shahid Manzoor, Muhammad Khalid Anser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xianghua YueSchool of Economics and Management, Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, 423000, PR China.
Shahzad Khan DurraniSchool of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, PR China. shahzaddurrani@hotmail.com.
Runfa LiBusiness School, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, 510850, PR China.
Wenling LiuSchool of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, PR China. liu_wenling@126.com.
Shahid ManzoorBusiness School, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, 510850, PR China.
Muhammad Khalid AnserDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye.

Funding

General Program of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education, China . 22YJA840017Hunan Provincial Department of Education's Key Research Project 24A0611Hunan Provincial Philosophy and Social Sciences General Project 22YBA231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chinese elderly healthcare services face problems of poor service quality, difficulty in eliminating hidden quality risks, and inadequate government supervision, primarily due to information asymmetry and insufficient supervision among providers, users, and regulatory bodies. The study addresses two key questions: How does information asymmetry influence private sector strategies in elderly healthcare public-private partnership (PPP), and what regulatory models can overcome the potential shortcomings? The study examines the influence of information asymmetry, particularly on "experience" and "credence," crucial for governance and service quality in elderly healthcare PPPs in China. By developing the novel methodology of evolutionary game theory and employing MATLAB simulations, this study analyzes private sector behavior under two distinct regulatory models. The research findings reveal a significant disparity, under the traditional "single" model; private sectors often prioritize low-quality services driven by self-interest or inadequate penalties, while the collaborative model incentivizes them to deliver higher-quality services influenced by factors such as public participation, reputational incentives, and penalties. Therefore, the paper proposed a multifaceted regulatory model based on strengthening third-party evaluation mechanisms, encouraging public participation, and refining reward and penalty systems. This proposed model will not only significantly contribute to regulatory effectiveness and quality services within elderly healthcare PPP projects, but will also serve as a reference point for government decision-makers responsible for quality services within PPP projects.

Indexed as

Game TheoryHealth Services for the AgedPrivate SectorPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsAgedChinaHumansQuality of Health CareElderly healthcare PPP projectEvolutionary gameInformation asymmetryPublic participationReputation incentiveThe third-party evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39891183
PMCPMC11783943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.