Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39891159›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

A deep learning model for assistive decision-making during robot-aided rehabilitation therapies based on therapists' demonstrations.

David Martínez-Pascual, José M Catalán, Luís D Lledó, Andrea Blanco-Ivorra, Nicolás García-Aracil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David Martínez-PascualRobotics and Artificial Intelligence Group, Bioengineering Institute, Miguel Hernández University, Avenida de la Universidad, s/n., 03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain. david.martinezp@umh.es.
José M CatalánRobotics and Artificial Intelligence Group, Bioengineering Institute, Miguel Hernández University, Avenida de la Universidad, s/n., 03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Luís D LledóRobotics and Artificial Intelligence Group, Bioengineering Institute, Miguel Hernández University, Avenida de la Universidad, s/n., 03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Andrea Blanco-IvorraRobotics and Artificial Intelligence Group, Bioengineering Institute, Miguel Hernández University, Avenida de la Universidad, s/n., 03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Nicolás García-AracilRobotics and Artificial Intelligence Group, Bioengineering Institute, Miguel Hernández University, Avenida de la Universidad, s/n., 03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PLEC2022-009424Agencia Estatal de Investigación TED2021-130431B-I00Ministerio de Universidades FPU20/05137Ministerio de Universidades PID2019-108310RB-I00Ministerio de Universidades PID2022-139957OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA promising approach to improving motor recovery during rehabilitation is the use of robotic rehabilitation devices. These robotic devices provide tools to monitor the patient's recovery progress while providing highly standardized and intensive therapy. A major challenge in using these robotic devices is the ability to decide when to assist the user. In this context, we propose a Deep Learning-based solution that can learn from a therapist's criteria when a patient needs assistance during robot-aided rehabilitation therapy.

methodsAn experimental session was conducted with diverse people who suffered from neurological conditions. The participants used an upper limb rehabilitation robot to play a point-to-point game. A therapist supervised the robot-aided rehabilitation exercises and assisted the participants when considered necessary. This assistance provided by the therapist was detected to label those trajectories that were assisted to train a Deep Learning model that learns from the therapist when to assist. A series of transformations have been applied to the trajectories performed by the participants to generalize the method. Furthermore, the trajectory data was divided into sequences to be introduced to the model and continuously infer whether the user needs assistance. The data acquired during the experimental sessions have been divided into two datasets to train and evaluate the model: intra-participants (80% training, 20% validation) and test participants. The architecture of the Deep Learning model is conceived to perform time-series classification. It consists of diverse one-dimensional convolutional layers, a convolutional attention mechanism, and a Global Average Pooling layer. In addition, the output layer has one neuron with the sigmoid activation function, whose output can be interpreted as a probability of assistance. The model proposed in this study has been evaluated according to different metrics. In addition, the impact of applying fine-tuning to adapt the assistance to each user has been evaluated with the test participants.

resultsThe proposed model achieved an accuracy of 91.39% and an F1-Score of 75.15% with the validation dataset during a sequence-to-sequence evaluation, surpassing other state-of-the-art architectures. When evaluating the trajectories collected in the test dataset, the method proposed achieved an accuracy of 76.09% and an F1-Score of 74.42% after applying fine-tuning to each participant.

conclusionsThe results achieved by our Deep Learning-based method show the feasibility of learning assistance decision-making from experimented therapists. Furthermore, fine-tuning can be applied to personalize the assistance to each user and improve the accuracy of the method presented when deciding whether to assist with the rehabilitation robot.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDeep LearningNeurological RehabilitationRoboticsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUpper ExtremityAssistance as neededDeep learningExergamesNeurorehabilitationRehabilitation robotics

Identifiers

PMID39891159
PMCPMC11786484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.