ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Evaluation of caesarean rates according to Robson classification using a newly developed smart phone application in a tertiary center in Sri Lanka: a comparative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health system drivers of caesarean deliveries in south Asia: a scoping review.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Review
- Robson Caesarean Calc© App: A User-Friendly Tool for Healthcare Providers.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Review
- Evaluation of caesarean rates according to Robson classification using a newly developed smart phone application in a tertiary center in Sri Lanka: a comparative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCaesarean section (CS) rates in Sri Lanka have escalated significantly, with projections indicating that over half of all births may involve CS by 2025. To address this rise and mitigate maternal morbidity, it is essential that CS procedures are medically justified. This study evaluates RobsApp®, a novel smartphone application designed to collect high-quality prospective data on CS rates based on the Robson classification.
methodsThe study utilized RobsApp® for data collection in the Professorial Unit of De Soysa Hospital for Women (DSHW), Sri Lanka. Data were collected prospectively from 1,712 deliveries between April and October 2019. The analysis focused on CS rates across different Robson categories and the quality of the collected data, comparing them with previous data obtained using traditional methods.
resultsThe overall CS rate was 33.0%, with Robson category 5a accounting for most cases. Emergency CS constituted 49.6% of all procedures, with cardiotocograph (CTG) abnormalities being the leading indication. The quality of the data collected through RobsApp® met the standards recommended by the Robson guidance, as evidenced by the study's ability to accurately categorize deliveries and assess CS rates.
conclusionsRobsApp® has proven to be an effective tool for prospective data collection, aligning well with Robson guidelines and facilitating high-quality data gathering. The study reveals a rising trend in CS rates at DSHW, particularly for reasons beyond previous CS. The inclusion of demographic data and birth weight analysis in future studies will enhance comparisons and insights into reducing CS rates. ETHICS: Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo (Ref - EC-19-024) which waived the need for individual consent. Study adhered to the Helsinki Declaration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.