ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Exploration of rituximab treatment strategies for membranous nephropathy adapted to the Chinese healthcare environment.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term real-world outcomes of rituximab in primary membranous nephropathy: a 154-patient cohort study from China.Renal failure · 2026Article
- A New Perspective on Predicting PLA2R-Associated Membranous Nephropathy Relapse: The Value of a Genetic Risk Score.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to explore the specific efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in the treatment of membranous nephropathy (MN) and compare and analyze the differences in effectiveness among various treatment regimens, with the objective of identifying the optimal treatment protocol suitable for the medical environment in China. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective study focused on patients with MN who were treated with RTX and hospitalized at the First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital between January 1, 2019, and December 30, 2022. These patients were followed up for more than one year. We collected clinical data from these patients and categorized them into three groups on the basis of their RTX treatment background: the combined glucocorticoids (GCs) and/or immunosuppressants (IMS) and RTX monotherapy treatment groups, the initial and non-initial treatment groups, and the standard RTX and non-standard RTX treatment groups. The study evaluated the comprehensive outcomes of complete or partial remission during follow-up, as well as relapses after remission. Additionally, Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors influencing patient remission and relapse.
resultsA total of 126 patients were enrolled in this study, with an average age of 49.0 ± 13.4 years. Among them, males accounted for up to 77.8%, with an average BMI of 26.7 ± 4.0. Among these patients, 59.5% (75/126) received RTX combined with GCs and/or IMS. Statistical results revealed that the combined use of GCs and/or the IMS had no significant effect on renal remission (P = 0.439), but it accelerated the process of renal remission (P = 0.010). A total of 34.9% (42/126) of patients chose RTX as the initial treatment. Compared with the non-initial treatment group, this choice did not significantly differ in terms of efficacy or faster remission speed (all P > 0.05). On the other hand, 39.7% (50/126) of patients received the standard RTX treatment regimen. Compared with the non-standard group, the standard RTX treatment group presented a better remission rate (P < 0.001) and a faster remission speed (P = 0.027). During 13.0 (12.0, 20.0) months of follow-up, the cumulative remission rate reached 73% (92/126), including 47.6% (60/126) of patients with partial remission (PR) and 25.4% (32/126) of patients with complete remission (CR). The cumulative relapse rate was 20.7% (26/126). In addition, 17.5% (22/126) of patients experienced adverse reactions. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the standard RTX treatment regimen was associated with a better remission rate, whereas comorbid diabetes reduced the remission rate. Older age and higher white blood cell counts may lead to a higher relapse rate.
conclusionThis study revealed that RTX treatment has a high remission rate and a low relapse rate in MN patients. The standard RTX treatment regimen can provide better benefits. However, our experience is limited by its retrospective design and relatively small sample size, and further large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.