ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting perioperative transfusion in children undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dose-effect relationship between red blood cell transfusion volume and adverse events in pediatric cardiac surgery.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Quality management of comprehensive blood conservation strategies during cardiopulmonary bypass in pediatric cardiac surgery.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Predictive value of oxygen delivery and regional oxygen saturation during cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury in neonates with congenital heart disease.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTimely recognition of perioperative red blood cell transfusion (PRT) risk is crucial for developing personalized blood management strategies in pediatric patients. In this study, we sought to construct a prediction model for PRT risk in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
methodsFrom September 2014 to December 2021, 23,884 pediatric patients under the age of 14 were randomly divided into training and testing cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. Variable selection was performed using univariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Multivariate logistic regression was then used to identify predictors, and a nomogram was developed to predict PRT risk. The model's performance was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility in both cohorts.
resultsAfter multiple rounds of variable selection, eight predictors of PRT risk were identified: age, weight, preoperative hemoglobin levels, presence of cyanotic congenital heart disease, CPB duration, minimum rectal temperature during CPB, CPB priming volume, and the use of a small incision. The predictive model incorporating these variables demonstrated strong performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.886 (95% CI: 0.880-0.891) in the training cohort and 0.883 (95% CI: 0.875-0.892) in the testing cohort. The calibration plot closely aligned with the ideal diagonal line, and decision curve analysis indicated that the model provided a net clinical benefit.
conclusionsOur predictive model exhibits good performance in assessing PRT risk in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, providing clinicians a practical tool to optimize individualized perioperative blood management strategies for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.