ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Flexible analysis of spatial transcriptomics data (FAST): a deconvolution approach.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- RETROFIT: Reference-free deconvolution of cell-type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- FlashDeconv reveals resolution horizons in atlas-scale spatial transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Cell-type deconvolution methods for spatial transcriptomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- BASIN: Bayesian mAtrix variate normal model with Spatial and sparsIty priors in Non-negative deconvolution.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Genomics insights of candidiasis: mechanisms of pathogenicity and drug resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationSpatial transcriptomics is a state-of-art technique that allows researchers to study gene expression patterns in tissues over the spatial domain. As a result of technical limitations, the majority of spatial transcriptomics techniques provide bulk data for each sequencing spot. Consequently, in order to obtain high-resolution spatial transcriptomics data, performing deconvolution becomes essential. Most existing deconvolution methods rely on reference data (e.g., single-cell data), which may not be available in real applications. Current reference-free methods encounter limitations due to their dependence on distribution assumptions, reliance on marker genes, or the absence of leveraging histology and spatial information. Consequently, there is a critical need for the development of highly flexible, robust, and user-friendly reference-free deconvolution methods capable of unifying or leveraging case-specific information in the analysis of spatial transcriptomics data.
resultsWe propose a novel reference-free method based on regularized non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), named Flexible Analysis of Spatial Transcriptomics (FAST), that can effectively incorporate gene expression data, spatial, and histology information into a unified deconvolution framework. Compared to existing methods, FAST imposes fewer distribution assumptions, utilizes the spatial structure information of tissues, and encourages interpretable factorization results. These features enable greater flexibility and accuracy, making FAST an effective tool for deciphering the complex cell-type composition of tissues and advancing our understanding of various biological processes and diseases. Extensive simulation studies have shown that FAST outperforms other existing reference-free methods. In real data applications, FAST is able to uncover the underlying tissue structures and identify the corresponding marker genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.