ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
External validation of the SCARE score in identifying acute coronary syndromes during medical regulation of chest pain.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical regulation of chest pain is challenging due to the multitude of potential diagnoses. The key challenge is to avoid misdiagnosing acute coronary syndrome while preventing over-triage. The SCARE score (based on age, sex, smoking, typical coronary pain, inaugural pain, sweats, and dispatcher's conviction) classifies patients as low, intermediate, or high risk of acute coronary syndrome. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the SCARE score among patients calling with chest pain.
methodsThis single-center prospective study was conducted at the Charleville-Mézières Emergency Medical Communication Centre. Data collection included standardized questionnaires and call tape reviews. The SCARE score was compared with final diagnoses from medical records.
resultsFrom October 2 to November 16, 2023, 194 patients were included, with 32 (16%) diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. Of these, 24 patients (75%) were managed by a prehospital medical team. The AUROC for the SCARE score was 0.80 [95% CI 0.73-0.87]. At a low-risk threshold (26), sensitivity was 100% [95% CI 89-100] and specificity was 45% [95% CI 37-53]. At a high-risk threshold (36), sensitivity was 72% [95% CI 53-86] and specificity was 70% [95% CI 63-77].
conclusionThe SCARE score exhibited excellent sensitivity and overall acceptable performance in predicting acute coronary syndrome in patients calling with non-traumatic chest pain.
trial registrationID-RCB 2023-A01672-43.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.