Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890983›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A comparative analysis of LSTM models aided with attention and squeeze and excitation blocks for activity recognition.

Murad Khan, Yousef Hossni

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Murad KhanKuwait College of Science and Technology, Doha District, Kuwait.
Yousef HossniKuwait College of Science and Technology, Doha District, Kuwait. 221600@student.kcst.edu.kw.

Funding

Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences PN23-15EM-1901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human Activity Recognition plays a vital role in various fields, such as healthcare and smart environments. Traditional HAR methods rely on sensor or video data, but sensor-based systems have gained popularity due to their non-intrusive nature. Current challenges in HAR systems include variability in sensor data influenced by factors like sensor placement, user differences, and environmental conditions. Additionally, imbalanced datasets and computational complexity hinder the performance of these systems in real-world applications. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an LSTM-based HAR model enhanced with attention and squeeze-and-excitation blocks. The LSTM captures temporal dependencies, while the attention mechanism dynamically focuses on important parts of the input sequence. The squeeze-and-excitation block recalibrates channel-wise feature importance, allowing the model to emphasize the most informative features. The proposed model demonstrated a 99% accuracy rate, showcasing its effectiveness in recognizing various activities from sensor data. The integration of attention and squeeze-and-excitation mechanisms further boosted the model's ability to handle complex datasets. Comparative analysis with existing LSTM models confirms that the proposed approach improves accuracy and reduces computational complexity, making it a highly suitable model for real-world applications.

Indexed as

AttentionHuman ActivitiesNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansActivity recognitionAttentionDeep learningLSTMMulti-headSqueeze and excitation

Identifiers

PMID39890983
PMCPMC11785954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.