ArticleScientific reports2025
A comparative analysis of LSTM models aided with attention and squeeze and excitation blocks for activity recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating neural decoding, memristive materials, and adaptive control frameworks for next-generation hippocampal memory prosthetics.iScience · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Powered Smart Healthcare Systems in the Era of Big Data: Applications, Diagnostic Insights, Challenges, and Ethical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Classification of User Behavior Patterns for Indoor Navigation Problem.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Wearable Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: Performance and Interpretability of Dynamic Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Attention-Enhanced CNN-LSTM Model for Exercise Oxygen Consumption Prediction with Multi-Source Temporal Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human Activity Recognition plays a vital role in various fields, such as healthcare and smart environments. Traditional HAR methods rely on sensor or video data, but sensor-based systems have gained popularity due to their non-intrusive nature. Current challenges in HAR systems include variability in sensor data influenced by factors like sensor placement, user differences, and environmental conditions. Additionally, imbalanced datasets and computational complexity hinder the performance of these systems in real-world applications. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an LSTM-based HAR model enhanced with attention and squeeze-and-excitation blocks. The LSTM captures temporal dependencies, while the attention mechanism dynamically focuses on important parts of the input sequence. The squeeze-and-excitation block recalibrates channel-wise feature importance, allowing the model to emphasize the most informative features. The proposed model demonstrated a 99% accuracy rate, showcasing its effectiveness in recognizing various activities from sensor data. The integration of attention and squeeze-and-excitation mechanisms further boosted the model's ability to handle complex datasets. Comparative analysis with existing LSTM models confirms that the proposed approach improves accuracy and reduces computational complexity, making it a highly suitable model for real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.