Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890977›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi-resource constrained elective surgical scheduling with Nash equilibrium toward smart hospitals.

Jun Xue, Zhi Li, Shuangli Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jun Xue *Department of General Surgery, Hebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Systems Biology and Gene Regulation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, 075000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-7859
Zhi Li *School of Economics and Management, Tiangong University, Tianjin, 300387, China. lizhi@tiangong.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-4869-6778
Shuangli ZhangSchool of Economics and Management, Tiangong University, Tianjin, 300387, China.ORCID 0009-0002-7183-0637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper focuses on the elective surgical scheduling problem with multi-resource constraints, including material resources, such as operating rooms (ORs) and non-operating room (NOR) beds, and human resources (i.e., surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses). The objective of multi-resource constrained elective surgical scheduling (MESS) is to simultaneously minimize the average recovery completion time for all patients, the average overtime for medical staffs, and the total medical cost. This problem can be formulated as a mixed integer linear multi-objective optimization model, and the honey badger algorithm based on the Nash equilibrium (HBA-NE) is developed for the MESS. Experimental studies were carried out to test the performance of the proposed approach, and the performance of the proposed surgical scheduling scheme was validated. Finally, to narrow the gap between the optimal surgical scheduling solution and actual hospital operations, digital twin (DT) technology is adopted to build a physical-virtual hospital surgery simulation model. The experimental results show that by introducing a digital twin, the physical and virtual spaces of the smart hospital can be integrated to visually simulate and verify surgical processes.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesElective Surgical ProceduresHospitalsAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansOperating RoomsDigital twinElective surgical schedulingHoney badger algorithm (HBA)Nash equilibriumSmart hospital

Identifiers

PMID39890977
PMCPMC11785977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.