Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890973›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predicting accrual success for better clinical trial resource allocation.

Sisi Ma, Yinzhao Wang, John Wagner, Steve Johnson, Serguei Pakhomov, Constantin Aliferis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sisi MaInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. sisima@umn.edu.
Yinzhao WangInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
John WagnerMedical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Steve JohnsonInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Serguei PakhomovCollege of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Constantin AliferisInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UM1TR004405 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Bruce R Blazar, Damien A Fair · 2023 to 2026
$30.8M
National Institutes of Health,United States 1UM1TR004405NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accrual success is one key determining factor for the success of clinical trials. Global data analyses of all terminated trials reported that 55% of trials were terminated due to low accrual rates. Failure to meet accrual goals have a significant impact on costs for sponsors, academic institutions, investigators, and society at large. The ability to predict trial accrual success with high precision before the trial starts would be highly valuable, preventing the allocation of critical resources for trials unlikely to meet accrual goals. In the present study, we constructed a dataset for predicting clinical trial failure based on poor accrual using clinicaltrial.gov data containing information on 57,846 trials. Features of the dataset were informed by prior literature and constructed using data-driven natural language processing methods. We built predictive models for accrual failure using state-of-the-art supervised machine learning protocols and methods. Models resulted in good predictive performance that was stable over a 10-year time period, with predictive performance of cross-validation AUC = 0.744 (+/-0.018) and prospective validation AUC = 0.737 (+/-0.038). We also improved model calibration and examined model performance with the reject option. These modifications enable model translation into decision support tools for various real-world settings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to develop models for predicting clinical trial failure due to accrual based on a large dataset with a comprehensive set of trial features.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicResource AllocationHumansMachine LearningClinical trialClinical trial accrualDecision supportPrediction

Identifiers

PMID39890973
PMCPMC11785987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.