Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890925›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Application of Hansen solubility parameters in the eutectic mixtures: difference between empirical and semi-empirical models.

Cláudio C Fernandes, Alexandre Paiva, Reza Haghbakhsh, Ana Rita C Duarte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cláudio C FernandesLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, Nova School of Science and Technology, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal.
Alexandre PaivaLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, Nova School of Science and Technology, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal.
Reza HaghbakhshLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, Nova School of Science and Technology, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal.
Ana Rita C DuarteLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, Nova School of Science and Technology, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal. aduarte@fct.unl.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hansen Solubility Parameters (HSPs) are widely used as a tool in solubility studies. Given the variety of existent approaches to predict these parameters, this investigation focused on estimating the HSPs of a set of Natural Deep Eutectic Systems (NADES), using empirical (EM) and semi-empirical models (SEM), and then understanding their differences/similarities. Although these theoretical models are designed and recommended mostly for simple molecules or simple solutions, they are still being used in eutectic systems studies, mainly empirical ones. Thus, a preliminary test was conducted with a set of conventional solvents, in which their experimental values of HSPs are known. Besides the confirmation of the EM as the most suitable for these kinds of regular solvents, the results found also showed a very similar behaviour to what was observed in NADES, i.e., in terms of suggesting the EM and SEM with the highest/lowest similarity. Furthermore, it was concluded that although there is a large discrepancy between the estimated values of the hydrogen bond parameter, especially for systems with a higher polar character, there is still a good similarity for the other parameters. In fact, it was observed that, when combining the semi-empirical models, it was possible to obtain a value of the hydrogen bond parameter more similar to the empirical ones.

Indexed as

Empirical modelHansen solubility parametersNatural deep eutectic systemsSemi-empirical models

Identifiers

PMID39890925
PMCPMC11785947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.