Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890918›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mixing of natural and urban dust along the Wasatch Front of northern Utah, USA.

Jeffrey S Munroe, Gregory T Carling, Kevin D Perry, Diego P Fernandez, Derek V Mallia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey S MunroeDepartment of Earth and Climate Sciences, Middlebury College, Middlebury, 05753, USA. jmunroe@middlebury.edu.
Gregory T CarlingDepartment of Geological Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
Kevin D PerryDepartment of Atmospheric Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Diego P FernandezDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Derek V MalliaDepartment of Atmospheric Science, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation EAR-012093National Science Foundation EAR-2012082National Science Foundation EAR-2012091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the composition and transport of mineral dust is essential for assessing its environmental and health impacts. We investigated the properties of mineral dust along the urbanized Wasatch Front in northern Utah (USA), comparing it with natural dust collected from upwind locations in the arid Great Basin. Using physical and geochemical analyses, we identified significant differences between urban and natural dust that are not attributable to the intervening landscapes. These differences arise from the mixing of natural dust with local anthropogenic materials, including sediments from the Great Salt Lake playa conditioned by over a century of urban activity. This urban-influenced dust is transported downwind, where it may contribute to elevated levels of cadmium, copper, and zinc in streams of downwind mountain watersheds. These findings underscore the far-reaching impact of urban dust on critical ecosystems and highlight the need for integrated management strategies to mitigate dust-related environmental consequences.

Identifiers

PMID39890918
PMCPMC11785936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.