ArticleScientific reports2025
Fragment optimized chalcone derivatives targeting OmpA protein as a therapeutic approach against multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the role of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) in biofilm formation and Harnessing them for targeting biofilm-forming bacterial infections.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Molecular identification of the blaOXA gene in Bacillus cereus and AI-driven optimization of natural phytochemicals for foodborne illness treatment.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- Proteomic Applications in Vaccine Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of KA7, a novel quinolone-based sorafenib analogue with potent anticancer and immunomodulatory activities.RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii is a notorious pathogen associated with life-threatening infections, with its outer membrane protein A (OmpA) being a key contributor to its pathogenicity by targeting epithelial cell apoptosis. The study presents an in silico analysis of chalcone derivatives as potential therapeutic agents against the outer membrane protein A (OmpA) of Acinetobacter baumannii. We performed molecular docking to evaluate the binding interactions, revealing that isobavachalcone exhibited the highest binding affinity. Further fragment optimization (FOI) of isobavachalcone improved its binding energy. Additionally, ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) analysis was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetic properties of the compounds. Antigenicity and allergenicity of the protein show that this protein is virulent and antigenic. Moreover, molecular docking was performed and the result shows that isobavachalcone showed the highest binding energy at -6.7 kcal/mol. Furthermore, for a more potent compound, fragment optimization was performed and led to a new lead compound fragment optimized isobavachalcone (FOI) which shows increased binding energy -6 kcal/mol. ADMET and toxicity analysis was performed of both the compounds isobavachalcone and FOI which revealed favorable pharmacokinetic profiles for both compounds, but toxicity analysis showed discrepancies, with the isobavachalcone exhibiting toxicity but FOI compound showing no detectable toxicity. This underscores the importance of structure optimization in drug development. Overall, chalcone derivatives show promise as antibacterial agents against A. baumannii, with computational analyses aiding in compound selection and optimization. While both isobavachalcone and its FOI showed favorable pharmacokinetics, in vivo and in vitro validation is needed to confirm their therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.