Trial reportScientific reports2025
Analysis of kinematic and kinetic changes in scoliosis following spinal manipulation.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scoliosis is a prevalent condition among adolescents, and the spinal manipulation is one of the conservative treatment methods for scoliosis patients. Impairment in movement function stands out as a typical characteristic in cases of scoliosis. This study utilized a single-arm clinical trial design involving 35 patients aged 18 to 20 with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and Cobb angles ranging from 10° to 30°. The treatment protocol consisted of spinal manipulation sessions three times a week, each lasting 40 min, administered over a span of six weeks. Pre- and post-intervention assessments focused on the Cobb angle and lower limb kinematics and kinetics during functional movements such as level walking, stair ascent, and descent. Patients with IS showed improvements in the Cobb angle, as well as changes in lower limb kinematics and kinetics during functional activities, such as walking and stair navigation, following six weeks of spinal manipulation intervention. The study further demonstrated that spinal manipulation reduced lower limb's sagittal joint mobility, increased stability in individuals with IS. Patients with IS exhibited significant changes in lower limb kinematics and kinetic following spinal manipulation, which may serve as a potential mechanism underlying the alteration of the Cobb angle. Future studies, particularly RCTs, are needed to further validate the effectiveness of spinal manipulation in treating IS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.