ArticleScientific reports2025
Chromosomal analysis and short-term outcome of prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parental Decision-Making Process in Termination of Pregnancy for Congenital Heart Disease: From the Multidisciplinary Perinatal Council of a Turkish Tertiary Center.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analyzing the global burden of 11 subtypes of congenital birth defects: trends, sociodemographic correlates, and outcomes from 1990 to 2021.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Prenatal diagnostic value of medium-coverage WGS and clinical Exome sequencing in fetal congenital heart disease.Future science OA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital structural heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of infant death from birth defects. Postnatal survival primarily depends on the type and severity of the defect. In addition, worse cardiac prognosis is observed when extra-cardiac anomalies (ECA) are associated. This retrospective chart review was aimed at finding markers for short-term outcome prediction of prenatally-diagnosed complex CHD, focusing in particular on the impact of CHD category, of CHD severity score and of prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of ECA or chromosomal anomalies on 4 primary outcomes: termination of pregnancy (TOP), intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal mortality and 1-year-survival rate. We reviewed medical files from 381 fetuses, presenting at our center between 2018 and 2021 with CHD for which prenatal advice by a pediatric cardiologist was sought. 341 fetuses met the inclusion criteria for the study. Twin pregnancies (7.62%; OR 4.76 (p < 0.001)) and pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology (7.33%; OR 2.44 (p < 0.001)) were more prevalent compared to the general population. CHD categories and CHD severity scores, ranging from A (extremely high risk based on CHD or ECA type) to D (low risk), were assigned to each fetus. Prenatal or postnatal chromosomal microarray results were available for 232 fetuses (68%) and were abnormal in 30 (12.9%). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine significant predictors for the primary outcomes 'TOP', 'postnatal demise before the age of 1 month' and 'survival at the age of 1 year'. TOP was carried out significantly more with: prenatal genetic diagnosis, severity score A and severity score B. Interestingly, a prenatal genetic diagnosis was negatively correlated with pregnancy continuation, but it was not a significant predictor for postnatal mortality, while a postnatal diagnosis of a genetic disorder impacted early but not late postnatal mortality. In addition, postnatal mortality both before the age of 1 month or before the age of 1 year was significantly associated with lower postmenstrual age at birth, CHD severity score B and major ECA at birth. These results underscore the importance of genotyping and of accurate cardiac and extracardiac phenotyping for prognostication in fetuses with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.