ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating waist-to-hip ratio in youth using frequency-modulated continuous wave radar and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anthropometric Indicators and Early Cardiovascular Prevention in Children and Adolescents: The Role of Education and Lifestyle.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Metabolic Implications of Childhood Cancer.Current pediatrics reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is an essential predictor of cardiometabolic diseases, but traditional tape-based WHR measurements in children and adolescents can cause discomfort due to direct contact and are prone to measurer variation. This study aimed to develop a non-invasive, precise, and convenient alternative for WHR measurement and central obesity assessment using frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar, and to evaluate its accuracy by comparing it with traditional measurement methods. We included 100 participants aged 7-18 and radar data were analyzed using point cloud generation processed through convolutional neural networks for estimating WHR. The radar-based WHR measurements were compared to conventional clinician measurements. Participants were classified into low (WHR < 0.86), moderate (≥ 0.86, < 0.91) and high WHR (≥ 0.91) groups, and the classifications were compared. Strong agreement was observed between the two methods, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (p = 0.023995). The radar system achieved 82% accuracy in classifying participants into the correct abdominal obesity risk groups. Our findings demonstrate that FMCW radar can be a reliable tool for routine monitoring of central obesity. This technology addresses concerns about privacy and discomfort, making it suitable for widespread application in both clinical and non-clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.