Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890848›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Using machine learning to predict outcomes following transcarotid artery revascularization.

Ben Li, Naomi Eisenberg, Derek Beaton, Douglas S Lee, Leen Al-Omran, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Mohamad A Hussain, Ori D Rotstein, Charles de Mestral, Muhammad Mamdani and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ben LiDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Naomi EisenbergDivision of Vascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Derek BeatonData Science & Advanced Analytics, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Douglas S LeeDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Leen Al-OmranSchool of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Duminda N WijeysunderaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mohamad A HussainDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, USA.
Ori D RotsteinDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Charles de MestralDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Muhammad MamdaniInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Graham Roche-NagleDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mohammed Al-OmranDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. mohammed.al-omran@unityhealth.to.

Funding

CIHR 202210MFE-489827-89477Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Clinician Investigator ProgramPhysicians' Services Incorporated Foundation R22-45Schwartz Reisman Institute for Technology and Society at the University of Toronto Graduate Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a relatively new and technically challenging procedure that carries a non-negligible risk of complications. Risk prediction tools may help guide clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms that predict 1-year outcomes following TCAR. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was used to identify patients who underwent TCAR between 2016 and 2023. We identified 115 features from the index hospitalization (82 pre-operative [demographic/clinical], 14 intra-operative [procedural], and 19 post-operative [in-hospital course/complications]). The primary outcome was 1-year post-procedural stroke or death. The data was divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Six ML models were trained using pre-operative features with tenfold cross-validation. Overall, 38,325 patients were included (mean age 73.1 [SD 9.0] years, 14,248 [37.2%] female) and 2,672 (7.0%) developed 1-year stroke or death. The best pre-operative prediction model was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.92). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC of 0.68 (95% CI 0.66-0.70). The XGBoost model maintained excellent performance at the intra- and post-operative stages, with AUROC's (95% CI's) of 0.92 (0.91-0.93) and 0.94 (0.93-0.95), respectively. Our ML algorithm has potential for important utility in guiding peri-operative risk-mitigation strategies to prevent adverse outcomes following TCAR.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStrokeTreatment OutcomeDeathMachine learningOutcomePredictionStrokeTranscarotid artery revascularization (TCAR)

Identifiers

PMID39890848
PMCPMC11785798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.