Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890831›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Measuring China's Policy Stringency on Climate Change for 1954-2022.

Bo Li, Enxian Fu, Shuhao Yang, Jiaying Lin, Wei Zhang, Jian Zhang, Yaling Lu, Jiantong Wang, Hongqiang Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bo Li *Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Planning and Policy Simulation, Beijing, 100043, China.
Enxian Fu *Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, 02138, USA.
Shuhao YangChinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Centre of Situation Analysis and Planning Assessment, Beijing, 100043, China.
Jiaying LinWorld Resources Institute China, Sustainable Cities Program, Beijing, 100027, China.
Wei ZhangChinese Academy of Environmental Planning, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Planning and Policy Simulation, Beijing, 100043, China. zhangwei@caep.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9279-380X
Jian ZhangSchool of Government, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, 100081, China. zjcufe@cufe.edu.cn.
Yaling LuChinese Academy of Environmental Planning, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Planning and Policy Simulation, Beijing, 100043, China.
Jiantong WangChinese Academy of Environmental Planning, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Planning and Policy Simulation, Beijing, 100043, China.
Hongqiang JiangChinese Academy of Environmental Planning, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Planning and Policy Simulation, Beijing, 100043, China.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology) 2021YFC1809000Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology) 2022YFF0802504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts on climate change have demonstrated tangible impacts through various actions and policies. However, a significant knowledge gap remains: comparing the stringency of climate change policies over time or across jurisdictions is challenging due to ambiguous definitions, the lack of a unified assessment framework, complex causal effects, and the difficulty in achieving effective measurement. Furthermore, China's climate governance is expected to address multiple objectives by integrating main effects and side effects, to achieve synergies that encompass environmental, economic, and social impacts. This paper employs an integrated framework comprising lexicon, text analysis, machine learning, and large-language model applied to multi-source data to quantify China's policy stringency on climate change (PSCC) from 1954 to 2022. To achieve effective, robust, and explainable measurement, Chain-of-Thought and SHAP analysis are integrated into the framework. By framing the PSCC on varied sub-dimensions covering mitigation, adaptation, implementation, and spatial difference, this dataset maps the government's varied stringency on climate change and can be used as a robust variable to support a series of downstream causal analysis.

Identifiers

PMID39890831
PMCPMC11785789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.