ArticleNature communications2025
An atlas of metabolites driving chemotaxis in prokaryotes.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diversity of Pharmaceuticals Enhances Antibiotic Resistance in the Invertebrate Gut via Biofilm-Mediated Mechanisms.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Chemotaxis to plant defense compounds in phytopathogens.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Specificities of chemosensory receptors in the human gut microbiota.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa Performs Chemotaxis to All Major Human Neurotransmitters.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Review
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa Performs Chemotaxis to the Neurotransmitters Serotonin, Dopamine, Epinephrine and Norepinephrine.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- A structural perspective on insect gustatory receptors.Chemical senses · 2025Review
- Thermal shift assay to identify ligands for bacterial sensor proteins.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemicals inducing chemotaxis have been characterised for over 60 years across hundreds of publications. Without any synthesis of these scattered results, our current understanding of the molecules affecting prokaryotic behaviours is fragmented. Here, we examined 341 publications to assemble a comprehensive database of prokaryotic chemoeffectors, compiling the effect (attractant, repellent or neutral) of 926 chemicals previously tested and the chemotactic behaviour of 394 strains. Our analysis reveals that (i) not all chemical classes trigger chemotaxis equally, in particular, amino acids and benzenoids are much stronger attractants than carbohydrates; (ii) over one-quarter of attractants tested are not used for growth but solely act as chemotactic signals; (iii) the prokaryote's origin matters, as terrestrial strains respond to 50% more chemicals than those originating from human or marine biomes; (iv) repellents affect cell behaviour at concentrations 10-fold higher than attractants; (v) the effect of large molecules and the behaviour of bacteria other than Proteobacteria have been largely overlooked. Taken together, our findings provide a unifying view of the chemical characteristics that affect prokaryotic behaviours globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.