ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
DICOM LUT is a Key Step in Medical Image Preprocessing Towards AI Generalizability.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seeing the Risk in Virtual Fat-Suppressed Spine MRI: External Benchmarking and Uncertainty-Guided Selective Risk Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research-Part 4: Prerequisites for a successful orthopedics AI-driven project in terms of interdisciplinary collaboration, data management, ethical approval and technology.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Hidden Fragilities and the Path to Resilience.Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Unlocking the potential of real-time ICU mortality prediction: redefining risk assessment with continuous data recovery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Feasibility Study of Detecting and Segmenting Small Brain Tumors in a Small MRI Dataset with Self-Supervised Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Image pre-processing has significant impact on performance of deep learning models in medicine; yet, there is no standardized method for DICOM pre-processing. In this study, we investigate the impact of two commonly used image preprocessing techniques, histogram equalization (HE) and values-of-interest look-up-table (VOI-LUT) transformations on the performance deep learning classifiers for chest X-rays (CXR). We generated two baseline datasets (raw pixel and standard DICOM processed) from our internal CXR dataset and then enhanced both with HE to create four distinct datasets. Four independent deep learning models for diagnosis of pneumothorax were trained and evaluated on two external datasets. Results reveal that HE enhancement significantly affects model performance, particularly in terms of generalizability. Models trained solely on HE-enhanced datasets exhibit poorer performance on external validation sets, suggesting potential overfitting and information loss. These models also exhibit shortcut learning, relying on spurious correlations in the training data for their prediction. This study highlights the importance of machine learning practitioners being aware of preprocessing techniques applied to datasets and their potential impacts on model performance, as well as need for including preprocessing information when sharing datasets. Additionally, this research underscores the necessity of using pixel values closer to clinical standards during dataset curation to improve model robustness and mitigate the risk of information loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.