ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Artificial Intelligence Methods in Infection Biology Research.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating mathematical modelling and artificial intelligence to combat emerging viral syndemics: A systematic review.New microbes and new infections · 2026Review
- AI Methods Tailored to Influenza, RSV, HIV, and SARS-CoV-2: A Focused Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite unprecedented achievements, the domain-specific application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the realm of infection biology was still in its infancy just a couple of years ago. This is largely attributable to the proneness of the infection biology community to shirk quantitative techniques. The so-called "sorting machine" paradigm was prevailing at that time, meaning that AI applications were primarily confined to the automation of tedious laboratory tasks. However, fueled by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic, AI-driven applications in infection biology made giant leaps beyond mere automation. Instead, increasingly sophisticated tasks were successfully tackled, thereby ushering in the transition to the "Swiss army knife" paradigm. Incentivized by the urgent need to subdue a raging pandemic, AI achieved maturity in infection biology and became a versatile tool. In this chapter, the maturation of AI in the field of infection biology from the "sorting machine" paradigm to the "Swiss army knife" paradigm is outlined. Successful applications are illustrated for the three data modalities in the domain, that is, images, molecular data, and language data, with a particular emphasis on disentangling host-pathogen interactions. Along the way, fundamental terminology mentioned in the same breath as AI is elaborated on, and relationships between the subfields these terms represent are established. Notably, in order to dispel the fears of infection biologists toward quantitative methodologies and lower the initial hurdle, this chapter features a hands-on guide on software installation, virtual environment setup, data preparation, and utilization of pretrained models at its very end.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39890733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.