Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890733›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Artificial Intelligence Methods in Infection Biology Research.

Jacob Marcel Anter, Artur Yakimovich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob Marcel AnterCenter for Advanced Systems Understanding (CASUS), Görlitz, Germany.
Artur YakimovichCenter for Advanced Systems Understanding (CASUS), Görlitz, Germany. a.yakimovich@hzdr.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite unprecedented achievements, the domain-specific application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the realm of infection biology was still in its infancy just a couple of years ago. This is largely attributable to the proneness of the infection biology community to shirk quantitative techniques. The so-called "sorting machine" paradigm was prevailing at that time, meaning that AI applications were primarily confined to the automation of tedious laboratory tasks. However, fueled by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic, AI-driven applications in infection biology made giant leaps beyond mere automation. Instead, increasingly sophisticated tasks were successfully tackled, thereby ushering in the transition to the "Swiss army knife" paradigm. Incentivized by the urgent need to subdue a raging pandemic, AI achieved maturity in infection biology and became a versatile tool. In this chapter, the maturation of AI in the field of infection biology from the "sorting machine" paradigm to the "Swiss army knife" paradigm is outlined. Successful applications are illustrated for the three data modalities in the domain, that is, images, molecular data, and language data, with a particular emphasis on disentangling host-pathogen interactions. Along the way, fundamental terminology mentioned in the same breath as AI is elaborated on, and relationships between the subfields these terms represent are established. Notably, in order to dispel the fears of infection biologists toward quantitative methodologies and lower the initial hurdle, this chapter features a hands-on guide on software installation, virtual environment setup, data preparation, and utilization of pretrained models at its very end.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2Artificial intelligenceComputer visionDeep learningHost–pathogen interactionsInfection biologyMachine learningNatural language processingPathogensProtein–protein interactionsVirology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.