Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890721›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Animal Models in Influenza Research.

Jie Zhou, Johanneke D Hemmink, Catherine J Whittaker, Holly A Shelton, Thomas Peacock

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jie ZhouDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Johanneke D HemminkInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya. H.Hemmink@cgiar.org.
Catherine J WhittakerInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya.
Holly A SheltonThe Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Thomas PeacockThe Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal model systems for human and animal influenza virus infection and transmission have been established to address research questions which cannot be addressed using in vitro models. Several animal models are widely used, including mice, guinea pigs, hamsters, ferrets, pigs, poultry, nonhuman primates, and others. Each animal model has its own strength and weaknesses, which should be taken into consideration to select the appropriate animal model to use. This chapter will describe standard protocols relevant for in vivo experiment, including procedures required prior to the start of the animal experiment and sample processing. The animal models described in this chapter are mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, ferrets, pigs, and chickens.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalInfluenza, HumanOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAnimalsChickensCricetinaeFerretsGuinea PigsHumansMiceSwineAerosolAnimal modelChickenFerretGuinea pigHamsterInfluenzaIntranasal challenge (IN)MousePigSwabTransmission

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.