ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Microbiological profiles of infectious corneal ulcers in Derbyshire and North Nottinghamshire-a 10-year analysis.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contact lens-related versus non-contact lens-relatedFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the spectrum of organisms causing microbial keratitis and their in-vitro anti-microbial sensitivities out of 2 hospitals in the East Midlands Region of the United Kingdom.
methodsA retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who underwent corneal scrapes for infectious keratitis between 2011 and 2021 at Royal Derby Hospital (RDH) in Derby and between 2009 and 2021 at King's Mill Hospital in Mansfield.
resultsIn total, the results of 645 corneal scrapes (from 622 patients) were analysed after exclusions. Of these, 307 (47.6%) yielded positive cultures. The mean patient age was 52.6 ± 22.1 years (Mean ± St Dev) across both sites and 332 (51.4%) were from female patients. At RDH, there were 195 positive corneal scrape cultures, from which 250 species of organisms were isolated. At RDH, 64% (160/250) were Gram-positive bacteria, 32% (81/250) were Gram-negative bacteria, 2.4% (6/250) were Acanthamoeba species and 1.2% were fungi (3/250). At KMH, there were 112 positive cultures, from which 128 species of organisms were isolated. 14 corneal scrapes from KMH were polymicrobial. At KMH, 96% (123/128) were bacterial (51% Gram positive, 45% Gram negative), 3/128 (2.3%) were fungi and 2/128 (1.6%) were Acanthamoeba. Sensitivity testing confirmed that the fluoroquinolone class of antibiotics appeared to be effective against the majority isolates across the two hospital sites.
conclusionThere are differences in microbiological profiles between these neighbouring hospitals covering neighbouring populations. Despite these differences, reassuringly, the current first-line fluoroquinolone monotherapy treatment is an appropriate first-line treatment for both hospital sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39890693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.