ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Patient and caregiver perspectives on treatment decision-making for stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStem cell transplantation (SCT) is considered standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) but is still associated with substantial challenges for patients and caregivers. Given the challenging treatment process and availability of other treatment options, it is important to engage patients in treatment decision-making, particularly patients with MM who may have unique goals and preferences.
methodsWe conducted an exploratory focus-group study to evaluate how patients and caregivers make treatment decisions related to SCT. Fourteen patients who underwent SCT and 3 caregivers participated in three 2-h focus-group sessions. All 17 patients were selected from Janssen's Patient Engagement Research Council. Discussions focused on conversations about SCT, considerations for decision-making, and reflections about the decision to undergo SCT. This study was reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
resultsParticipants initially had limited knowledge about SCT but received information from their doctors and sought information from various sources. Key considerations during decision-making included long-term health impacts, side effects, and logistical and financial concerns. Most participants reported that they never considered or were never offered other treatment options, highlighting a need for improved education on available treatments for MM. Some participants also shared a desire for more information about the SCT process, particularly the recovery period, which they found more difficult than expected.
conclusionThese findings highlight potential opportunities for improved education to enhance shared decision-making in patients undergoing SCT and their caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39890679What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.