SynthesisClinical & experimental metastasis2025
Tumor-to-tumor metastases: systematic review and meta-analysis of 685 reported cases.
Synthesis in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma involving the vagina and a pre-existing uterine leiomyoma.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Tumor-to-tumor metastasis of breast carcinoma to clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a rare case with a review of the literature.CEN case reports · 2026Review
- The neuroimmune axis in breast cancer: from mechanistic insights to clinical applications.BMC medicine · 2026Review
- Breast carcinoma metastasizing to an adrenocortical adenoma: a case of tumour-to-tumour metastasis.Pathologica · 2026Article
- Tumor-to-tumor metastasis of small cell carcinoma of presumed pulmonary origin to a sphenoid ridge meningioma: A diagnostic pitfall in preoperative systemic evaluation.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Sellar and parasellar paraganglioma mimicking pituitary macroadenoma in a young female: A rare case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Emerging role of long non‑coding RNAs in the Rho/ROCK signaling pathway in tumor metastasis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Tumor-to-Tumor Metastasis: Breast Cancer Metastasizing to EGFR Exon 19-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma with Long-Term Disease-Free Survival.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor-to-tumor metastasis is an exceedingly rare phenomenon where secondary deposits of a tumor develops in another one. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aims to uncover and analyze reported cases to enhance our understanding and improve patients' care. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted to identify 685 cases of tumor-to-tumor metastasis from 543 articles. Key information, including the donor and recipient organs, tumor histology, primary to metastasis time interval, presence of distant metastases and overall survival was extracted and analyzed. The highest incidence of tumor-to-tumor metastasis was observed in breast cancer and lung cancer metastasizing to meningioma (n = 52, 7.6%; n = 49, 6.2%; respectively). There were 131 (19.2%) autopsy cases, 477 (69.6%) cases diagnosed in vivo, and in 77 cases (11.2%), the timing of diagnosis was unavailable. Death of the patient (including autopsy cases) was reported in 256 (37.4%) cases. In 160 (23.35%) patients, the primary of the metastasis (POM) was occult at the time of metastasis, and in 385 (56.2%) cases, the POM was already known. The median period between clinically overt primary cancer diagnosis and tumor-to-tumor metastasis was 2.0 years. Donor metastases to other sites were observed in 328 (47.9%) cases. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the primary-to-metastasis interval (< 3 vs > 3 years, HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.18-3.43, p = 0.01) and the presence of donor metastases to other sites (present vs absent; HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23-0.59, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with survival. In summary, our findings emphasize the necessity for heightened clinical vigilance, early detection, and tailored management to effectively address this unique and challenging clinical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39890663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.