ReviewJournal of occupational health2025
Adverse effects of nanoparticles on humans.
Review in Journal of occupational health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Edaravone-loaded ROS-responsive nanosystem for targeted ischemic stroke therapy by crossing the gut-brain barrier.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Experimentally recreated workplace environments contain submicron crystalline silica particles, including ultrafine particles, which have been identified in the mediastinal lymph nodes of construction workers.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Toxicity of Metal-Based Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Adverse effects of nanoparticles on humans.Journal of occupational health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It was previously thought that the particles inhaled by humans and having adverse effects were micron-sized; particles with a particularly high content of crystalline silica were thought to have harmful effects. In recent years, manufactured materials have been further refined to nano-level particles, and it has been reported that these ultrafine particles have different adverse effects, making it necessary to perform occupational health management for chemicals that differ from micron-sized particles. Here we report the adverse effects of carbon nanotubes, welding fumes, and organic substances as examples of nanoparticles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.