ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Balloon-assisted enteroscopy in the management of adult small-bowel intussusception: a comparative analysis of with and without double-balloon enteroscopy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdult small-bowel intussusception (ASI) is a rare condition with pathological etiologies in most patients. Previously, surgical intervention was the primary treatment modality; however, the introduction of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) has allowed preoperative BAE in some cases to confirm the leading point, thereby guiding management and reducing surgical need. In this study, we investigated whether the introduction of BAE has altered the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for ASI by retrospectively analyzing and comparing the clinicopathological features of patients before and after its introduction.
methodsFifty-three patients with ASI, initially diagnosed via abdominal computed tomography scanning at Korea University Guro Hospital from 2000 to 2023, were included in our study. Patients were grouped based on double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) usage, and clinicopathological outcomes were compared retrospectively.
resultsOf the 53 patients, 38 (71.7%) had enteroenteric-type intussusception and 15 (28.3%) had enterocolic-type intussusception. Among the patients with enteroenteric-type intussusception, 15.8% had a malignant cause, whereas in the enterocolic type, 60% had a malignant cause (p = 0.001). Of 38 patients with enteroenteric ASI, 15 (39.5%) underwent preoperative DBE. The surgical resection rate was significantly lower in the DBE group (40%) than in the non-DBE group (73.9%) (p = 0.037). Pathological diagnoses of patients who underwent surgical resection without preoperative DBE revealed 17.6% malignancies and 82.4% benign causes, including idiopathic intussusception (four cases) and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (two cases). No morbidity, mortality, or recurrence was observed.
conclusionPreoperative BAE is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic modality for ASI, particularly in cases of low-grade small-bowel obstruction, reducing surgical resection rates in most ASI cases. The introduction of the BAE has significantly improved ASI management, achieving high successful reduction rates and few surgical interventions. BAE should be considered a first-line diagnostic and therapeutic tool for ASI management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39890611What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.