Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890468›Full record

ReviewGenome research2025

Katharine M Jenike, Lucía Campos-Domínguez, Marilou Boddé, José Cerca, Christina N Hodson, Michael C Schatz, Kamil S Jaron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. DipSkmer: Reference-free population genomics with diploid genome skims.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Nuclear genome profiling of two species ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic, Proteomic, and Biochemical Study ofJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katharine M JenikeJohns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7276-8110
Lucía Campos-DomínguezCentre for Research in Agricultural Genomics, CRAG (CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB), Campus UAB, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8998-3394
Marilou BoddéTree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2107-5100
José CercaCenter for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 0313 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7788-4367
Christina N HodsonUniversity College London, UCL Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5400-6107
Michael C SchatzJohns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4118-4446
Kamil S JaronTree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom; kamil.jaron@sanger.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1470-5450

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wide array of currently available genomes displays a wonderful diversity in size, composition, and structure and is quickly expanding thanks to several global biodiversity genomics initiatives. However, sequencing of genomes, even with the latest technologies, can still be challenging for both technical (e.g., small physical size, contaminated samples, or access to appropriate sequencing platforms) and biological reasons (e.g., germline-restricted DNA, variable ploidy levels, sex chromosomes, or very large genomes). In recent years,

Indexed as

BiodiversityGenomicsAnimalsGenomeHumansSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID39890468
PMCPMC11874746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.