Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890461›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Disentangling the Component Processes in Complex Planning Impairments Following Ventromedial Prefrontal Lesions.

Eleanor Holton, Bas van Opheusden, Jan Grohn, Harry Ward, John Grogan, Patricia L Lockwood, Ili Ma, Wei Ji Ma, Sanjay G Manohar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eleanor HoltonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom eleanor.holton@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8162-4151
Bas van OpheusdenImbue, Inc., San Francisco, California 94114.
Jan GrohnDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9233-1066
Harry WardCentre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, Queen Mary University London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
John GroganTrinity Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 PX31, Ireland.
Patricia L LockwoodCentre for Human Brain Health, Institute for Mental Health and Centre for Developmental Science, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Ili MaDepartment of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden 2300, The Netherlands.
Wei Ji MaCenter for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York 10003.
Sanjay G ManoharDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in humans disrupts planning abilities in naturalistic settings. However, it is unknown which components of planning are affected in these patients, including selecting the relevant information, simulating future states, or evaluating between these states. To address this question, we leveraged computational paradigms to investigate the role of vmPFC in planning, using the board game task "Four-in-a-Row" (18 lesion patients, 9 female; 30 healthy control participants, 16 female) and the simpler "Two-Step" task measuring model-based reasoning (49 lesion patients, 27 female; 20 healthy control participants, 13 female). Damage to vmPFC disrupted performance in Four-in-a-Row compared with both control lesion patients and healthy age-matched controls. We leveraged a computational framework to assess different component processes of planning in Four-in-a-Row and found that impairments following vmPFC damage included shallower planning depth and a tendency to overlook game-relevant features. In the "Two-Step" task, which involves binary choices across a short future horizon, we found little evidence of planning in all groups and no behavioral differences between groups. Complex yet computationally tractable tasks such as "Four-in-a-Row" offer novel opportunities for characterizing neuropsychological planning impairments, which in vmPFC patients we find are associated with oversights and reduced planning depth.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesExecutive FunctionPrefrontal CortexAdultAgedDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor Performancecognitive neurosciencecomputational modelinglesionsplanningprefrontal cortexvalue-based decision-making

Identifiers

PMID39890461
PMCPMC11924998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.