Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890207›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2025

Decoding mpox: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the transmission and severity parameters of the 2022-2023 global outbreak.

Candida Diaz Brochero, Laura Cristina Nocua-Báez, Jorge Alberto Cortes, Kelly Charniga, Adriana Buitrago-Lopez, Zulma M Cucunubá

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Candida Diaz BrocheroDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2176-7388
Laura Cristina Nocua-BáezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jorge Alberto CortesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0882-9652
Kelly CharnigaPasteur Institute, Paris, France.
Adriana Buitrago-LopezDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.
Zulma M CucunubáDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia zulma.cucunuba@javeriana.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8165-3198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe 2022-2023 mpox outbreak has been the largest in history. We aim to synthesise the key epidemiological parameters related to the dynamics, transmission, and severity of mpox (incubation period, serial interval, generation time, infectious period, basic (R0) and effective (R(t)) reproductive number, and case fatality rate (CFR)).

methodsSystematic review of observational studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE and other sources up to September 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42023404503). Quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal for case series, cross-sectional and cohort studies, and a designed quality assessment questionnaire for mathematical models. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model.

resultsFor transmissibility parameters, we estimated a pooled incubation period of 7.60 (95% CI 7.14 to 8.10) days and a pooled serial interval of 8.30 (95% CI 6.74 to 10.23) days. One study reported a generation time of 12.5 days (95% CI 7.5 to 17.3). Three studies reported presymptomatic transmission in 27-50% of paired cases investigated. R(t) varied between 1.16 and 3.74 and R0 varied between 0.006 and 7.84. The epidemic peaked between August and September 2022 in Europe and the Americas whereas transmission has continued in African countries. For severity parameters, we estimated a pooled CFR by continent: 0.19% (95% CI 0.09% to 0.37%) for the Americas and 0.33% (95% CI 0.15% to 0.7%) for Europe. For Africa, we found that the CFRs of countries associated with group I were higher (range 17-64%) than those associated with group IIb (range 0-6%).

conclusionPooled mpox serial interval was slightly larger than pooled incubation period, suggesting transmission occurs mostly postsymptom onset, although presymptomatic transmission can occur in an important proportion of cases. CFR estimates varied by geographical region and were higher in Africa, in countries linked with clade I. Our results contribute to a better understanding of mpox dynamics, and the development of mathematical models to assess the impact of current and future interventions.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksMpox, MonkeypoxGlobal HealthHumansSeverity of Illness IndexEpidemiologyGlobal HealthPublic HealthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39890207
PMCPMC11792283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.