ArticleBMJ open2025
Reducing the urge to be physically active in patients with anorexia nervosa through virtual reality: protocol for a randomised-controlled feasibility trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWeight restoration is a primary goal in anorexia nervosa (AN) treatment. Recent studies suggest that addressing physical activity urges in patients with AN is a promising target to facilitate weight restoration. This trial will evaluate the feasibility of a virtual reality (VR)-based intervention as an add-on treatment to psychotherapy to improve activity urges and, consequently, initial treatment responses on core outcomes as targeted per AN treatment guidelines. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre feasibility trial adopts the single-blind, two-arm design and outcome measures of an intended full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) in order to establish that all necessary trial components work together as intended. It will evaluate feasibility as the primary endpoint and compare changes in ratings of the urge to be active between patients with AN randomly assigned to receiving VR intervention sessions and patients with AN in a control procedure. The feasibility of the full-scale RCT will depend on whether patients (1) will evaluate the experience as acceptable, (2) tolerate VR side effects and (3) will adhere to the intended intervention schedule. We define a set of three-tiered, formal progression criteria and employ a 'traffic light system' demarcating go (green), amend (amber) and stop (red) signals for advancing to the full-scale RCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Ruhr University Bochum's Medical Faculty at Campus East-Westphalia (AZ 2024-1296, 9 December 2024). Patients have to provide written consent before taking part in the study. The findings will be published with open access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00035681, German Clinical Trials Register.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.