Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890136›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

plaTform fOr Urinary tract infection diagnostiC evAluatioN (TOUCAN): a protocol for a prospective diagnostic accuracy study of point-of-care testing in patients suspected of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care clinics in England.

Philip J Turner, Thomas R Fanshawe, Jane Freeman, Margaret Glogowska, Alastair D Hay, Nicola Kenealy, Owain Llion, Rebecca Lowe, Mark Lown, Michael Moore and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Philip J TurnerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK philip.turner@phc.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-8939
Thomas R FanshaweNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-8934
Jane FreemanUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Margaret GlogowskaNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8029-1052
Alastair D HayCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nicola KenealyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Owain LlionNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rebecca LoweNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mark LownPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8309-568X
Michael MoorePrimary Care Medical Group, University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509
Valerie TatePublic co-investigator - unaffiliated, Oxford, UK.
Mark H WilcoxLeeds Teaching Hospitals & Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Mandy WoottonSpecialist Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Unit, Microbiology Cardiff, Public Health Wales, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Christopher C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0102-3453
Gail N HaywardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0852-627X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common condition with potentially serious sequelae that is mostly diagnosed and managed in primary care settings. Around half of all women have a UTI in their lifetime, and a quarter experience an infection caused by organisms resistant to more than one antibiotic. Reducing inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics is a core tenet of antimicrobial stewardship. However, current diagnostics for UTI are unfit for purpose in acute (highest prescribing) settings, being too slow to inform the required immediate decision-making and often confounded by sample contamination.Rapid point-of-care diagnostic tests (POCTs) that facilitate timely decision-making are potential solutions to this problem. Several such tests have reached advanced stages of technology readiness, but their diagnostic performance has not been evaluated in primary care with clinical users. To progress novel tests towards implementation, a diagnostic field study is required, to allow for parallel and sequential evaluation of multiple tests in a primary care population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit participants assigned female at birth from primary care clinics in England who contact their clinic with symptoms of acute uncomplicated UTI. Eligible participants will complete a short questionnaire to capture symptoms and symptom severity and will provide a urine sample. Samples will be split and initially tested using novel index tests (POCTs) and conventional urinalysis 'dipstick' at the primary care clinic. The second part of the sample will be processed at a National Health Service-based reference laboratory using a modified reference standard including microscopy, microbiological culture, pathogen speciation and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The UTI reference standard culture, although based on the national methods, is modified to provide accurate bacterial counts, better to define a microbiological diagnosis of UTI. Susceptibility testing will be performed using 'gold-standard' methods, not usually performed in diagnostic laboratories. The primary outcome will be the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of POCTs for detection of UTI and antimicrobial susceptibility for POCTs that include antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Secondary outcomes will include the symptom profile of patients presenting with uncomplicated UTI, a theoretical determination of how use of POCT results might change prescribing, an understanding of POCT failure rate and qualitative capture of the experiences of those using the POCT to deliver the study in primary care clinics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from the London Central Research Ethics Committee (23/LO/0371) and the UK Health Research Authority. We will publish the findings of The plaTform fOr Urinary tract infection diagnostiC evAluatioN evaluations in peer-reviewed medical journals and more broadly following a dissemination plan formulated by a communications specialist in consultation with patients and the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN80937472.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingUrinary Tract InfectionsAcute DiseaseAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnglandFemaleHumansPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsDiagnostic microbiologyPrimary CareUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID39890136
PMCPMC11792275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.