ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2025
Mathematical models of intercellular signaling in breast cancer.
Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Remodeling the tumor dormancy ecosystem to prevent recurrence and metastasis.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe development and regulation of healthy and cancerous breast tissue is guided by communication between cells. Diverse signals are exchanged between cancer cells and non-cancerous cells of the tumor microenvironment (TME), influencing all stages of tumor progression. Mathematical models are essential for understanding how this complex network determines cancer progression and the effectiveness of treatment. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed the current dynamical mathematical models of intercellular signaling in breast cancer, examining models with cancer cells only, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, macrophages and the immune system as whole. We categorized the goals and complexity of these models, to highlight how they can explain many features of cancer emergence and progression.
resultsWe found that dynamical models of intercellular signaling can elucidate tissue-level dysregulation in cancer by explaining: i) maintenance of non-heritable intratumor phenotypic heterogeneity, ii) transitions between tumor dormancy and accelerated invasive growth, iii) stromal support of tumor vascularization and growth factor enrichment and iv) suppression of immune infiltration and cancer surveillance. These models also provide a framework to propose novel TME-targeting treatment strategies. However, most models were focused on a highly selected and small set of signaling interactions between a few cell types, and their translational applicability were severely limited by the availability of tumor-specific data for personalized model calibration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Mathematical models of breast cancer have many challenges and opportunities to incorporate signaling. The four key challenges are: 1) finding ways to treat signaling networks as a context-dependent language that incorporates non-linear and non-additive responses, 2) identifying the key cell phenotypes that signals control and understanding the feedbacks between signals and phenotype that determine the progression of cancer, (3) estimating parameters of specific patient tumors early in treatment, 4) linking models with novel data collection methods that have single cell and spatial resolution. As our approaches advance, it is our hope that dynamical mathematical models of inter-cellular signaling can play a central role in identifying and testing new treatment strategies as well as forecasting impacts of disease treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.