Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39890041›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2025

Mathematical models of intercellular signaling in breast cancer.

Frederick R Adler, Jason I Griffiths

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frederick R AdlerDepartment of Mathematics, University of Utah, 155 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; School of Biological Sciences, 257 South 1400 East, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112 USA.. Electronic address: fred.adler@biology.utah.edu.
Jason I GriffithsDepartment of Mathematics, University of Utah, 155 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.

Funding

Project 2: Targeting Cooperative Phenotypes Common in Spatial HeterogeneityU54CA209978 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CHANG, JEFFREY T · 2017 to 2021
$10.5M
Mechanism of estrogen independent proliferation in ER+ breast cancer cellsU01CA264620 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI BILD, ANDREA HOPE · 2021 to 2025
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA264620NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe development and regulation of healthy and cancerous breast tissue is guided by communication between cells. Diverse signals are exchanged between cancer cells and non-cancerous cells of the tumor microenvironment (TME), influencing all stages of tumor progression. Mathematical models are essential for understanding how this complex network determines cancer progression and the effectiveness of treatment. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed the current dynamical mathematical models of intercellular signaling in breast cancer, examining models with cancer cells only, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, macrophages and the immune system as whole. We categorized the goals and complexity of these models, to highlight how they can explain many features of cancer emergence and progression.

resultsWe found that dynamical models of intercellular signaling can elucidate tissue-level dysregulation in cancer by explaining: i) maintenance of non-heritable intratumor phenotypic heterogeneity, ii) transitions between tumor dormancy and accelerated invasive growth, iii) stromal support of tumor vascularization and growth factor enrichment and iv) suppression of immune infiltration and cancer surveillance. These models also provide a framework to propose novel TME-targeting treatment strategies. However, most models were focused on a highly selected and small set of signaling interactions between a few cell types, and their translational applicability were severely limited by the availability of tumor-specific data for personalized model calibration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Mathematical models of breast cancer have many challenges and opportunities to incorporate signaling. The four key challenges are: 1) finding ways to treat signaling networks as a context-dependent language that incorporates non-linear and non-additive responses, 2) identifying the key cell phenotypes that signals control and understanding the feedbacks between signals and phenotype that determine the progression of cancer, (3) estimating parameters of specific patient tumors early in treatment, 4) linking models with novel data collection methods that have single cell and spatial resolution. As our approaches advance, it is our hope that dynamical mathematical models of inter-cellular signaling can play a central role in identifying and testing new treatment strategies as well as forecasting impacts of disease treatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell CommunicationModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalSignal TransductionAnimalsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansTumor MicroenvironmentBreast cancerCommunicationIntercellular signalingMathematical modelingRegulation

Identifiers

PMID39890041
PMCPMC11858920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.