ReviewThe Biochemical journal2025
Expanding the tagging toolbox for visualizing translation live.
Review in The Biochemical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- UTag, a cysteine-free thermostable tagging system for tracking single mRNA translation live.Research square · 2026Article
- UTag, a cysteine-free thermostable tagging system for tracking single mRNA translation live.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- MicroLive: an image processing toolkit for quantifying live-cell single-molecule microscopy.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- MicroLive: An Image Processing Toolkit for Quantifying Live-cell Single-Molecule Microscopy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Advances in ribosome profiling technologies.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Translation is a highly regulated process that includes three steps: initiation, elongation, and termination. Tremendous efforts have been spent to study the regulation of each translation step. In the last two decades, researchers have begun to investigate translation by tracking it in its native and live intracellular environment with high spatiotemporal resolution. To achieve this goal, a handful of tagging tools have been developed that can distinguish nascent chains from previously synthesized mature proteins. In this review, we will focus on these tagging tools and describe their development, working mechanisms, and advantages and drawbacks in tracking translation in live mammalian cells and organisms. In the second part of the review, we will summarize novel discoveries in translation by a recently developed nascent polypeptide tracking technology using tandem epitope tag array tagging tools. The superior spatiotemporal resolution of this technology enables us to directly and continuously track nascent chains live and thus reveal preferred translation location and timing, as well as the kinetics of canonical and noncanonical translation, translation bursts, ribosome quality control, and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. In the future, we expect more tagging tools to be developed that allow us to track other regulation processes of a protein, such as folding, modifications, and degradation. With the expanding tagging toolbox, there is potential that we can track a protein from translation to degradation to fully understand its regulation in a native live cell environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.