ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Investigations into the Efficiency of Computer-Aided Synthesis Planning.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data augmentation in a triple transformer loop retrosynthesis model.Digital discovery · 2026Article
- Advanced machine learning for innovative drug discovery.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Accelerating the inference of string generation-based chemical reaction models for industrial applications.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficiency of machine learning (ML) models is crucial to minimize inference times and reduce the carbon footprints of models deployed in production environments. Current models employed in retrosynthesis to generate a synthesis route from a target molecule to purchasable compounds are prohibitively slow. The model operates in a single-step fashion in a tree search algorithm by predicting reactant molecules given a product molecule as input. In this study, we investigate the ability of alternative transformer architectures, knowledge distillation (KD), and simple hyper-parameter optimization to decrease inference times of the Chemformer model. Initially, we assess the ability of closely related transformer architectures and conclude that these models under-performed when using KD. Additionally, we investigate the effects of feature-based and response-based KD together with hyper-parameters optimized based on inference sample time and model accuracy. We find that although reducing model size and improving single-step speed are important, our results indicate that multi-step search efficiency is more significantly influenced by the diversity and confidence of single-step models. Based on this work, further research should use KD in combination with other techniques, as multi-step speed continues to prevent proper integration of synthesis planning. However, in Monte Carlo-based (MC) multi-step retrosynthesis, other factors play a crucial role in balancing exploration and exploitation during the search process, often outweighing the direct impact of single-step model speed and carbon footprints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.