Observational studyMedicine2025
Prediction potential of serum sulfatide levels at diagnosis for end-stage kidney disease progression in ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim was to investigate the ability of serum sulfatide levels at diagnosis to reflect the cross-sectional activity and further longitudinally predict the occurrence of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) during the follow-up period in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), regardless of kidney involvement at diagnosis. This study included 67 patients first diagnosed with AAV with available clinical data, including Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and blood samples at diagnosis. Serum sulfatide levels were assessed using stored serum samples at the time of diagnosis. The median age of the 67 patients (40.3% men and 59.7% women) was 61.0 years. During follow-up, 10 (14.9%) patients progressed to ESKD, and 4 (6.0%) died. Serum sulfatide levels significantly correlated with Five-Factor Score (r = -0.242), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (r = -0.315), and renal manifestation of the BVAS items (r = -0.296), but not BVAS at diagnosis. The cutoff of serum sulfatide levels at diagnosis for ESKD progression was 332.5 pg/mL. However, no significant cutoff of serum sulfatide levels for all-cause mortality was obtained. Patients with serum sulfatide levels ≤ 332.5 pg/mL at diagnosis exhibited both significantly higher frequency of ESKD progression (22.7% vs 0%, P = .012) and lower ESKD-free survival rate than those without (P = .011). This study highlighted the clinical usefulness of measuring serum sulfatide levels at the time of diagnosis as a biomarker to predict ESKD progression in patients with AAV regardless of kidney involvement at diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.