ArticleMedicine2025
Clinical value analysis of integrated care model in reducing bleeding and complications during Da Vinci robot-assisted urology.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the effect of integrated care mode on patients in Da Vinci robot-assisted urology surgery and provide a new nursing scheme for clinic. A total of 93 patients from August 2022 to March 2024 were selected and divided into intervention group (43 cases) and control group (50 cases). The operation time, blood loss, first postoperative exhaust time, time to get out of bed, pain score (visual analog scale), psychological status (self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale), quality of life score (36-Item Short Form Survey), catheter retention time, patient satisfaction, incision healing, incidence of urinary system infection, nutritional status, and complication rate were compared between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in baseline data and operative time between the 2 groups (P > .05), but the amount of intraoperative blood loss in the intervention group (250.32 ± 50.23) mL was less than that in the control group (320.56 ± 65.34) mL (P < .05). The first postoperative exhaust time and getting out of bed time in the intervention group were shorter than those in the control group (P < .05), and the pain visual analog scale score was lower than that in the control group (P < .05). The scores of self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale of mental state were better than those of the control group (P < .05), and the scores of quality of life were higher (P < .05). The retention time of catheter was shorter than that of the control group (P < .05), the patient satisfaction was 93.02% higher than that of the control group 78.00% (P < .05), and the grade A incision healing rate was 90.70% higher than that of the control group 76.00% (P < .05). The incidence of urinary system infection (4.65%) was lower than that of the control group (16.00%) (P < .05), the changes of serum albumin level and body weight were lower than that of the control group (P < .05), and the complication rate of 6.98% was lower than that of the control group (22.00%) (P < .05). Although the integrated medical care model did not significantly shorten the operation time, it was beneficial to the postoperative recovery of patients in many aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.