ArticleMedicine2025
Effect of weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer incidence and development are strongly correlated with obesity, however there is insufficient data to support a causal relationship between intentional weight loss and the prevention or promotion of cancer. We investigated the causal relationship between weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and the incidence of 18 cancers using Mendelian randomization (MR). A genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data related to weight loss following RYGB from the GWAS catalog database were used as exposure, and GWAS data related to 18 cancers from the Medical Research Council integrative epidemiology unit open GWAS project were used as outcomes. In order to investigate the causal relationship between exposure and results, we used a two-sample MR approach. The primary analysis technique was inverse variance weighting, with weighted median, and MR-Egger regression utilized as supplemental techniques to confirm the findings. Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were investigated using a variety of sensitivity studies, including the Cochran Q test, MR-Egger regression pleiotropy test, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier, and leave-one-out analysis. We included a total of 4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms as instrumental variables through rigorous quality control screening. Under the limitations of Bonferroni correction threshold (P < 2.78 × 10-3), our results suggest that the weight loss following RYGB has a significant causal relationship with a reduced risk of breast (odds ratio [OR]: 0.784; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.762-0.808; P = 2.167e-58) and lung cancer (OR: 0.992; 95% CI: 0.987-0.997; P = .0023), and a potential causal relationship with a decreased risk of hematological cancer (OR: 0.9998462; 95% CI: 0.9997088-0.9999836; P = .028) and an increased risk of cervical cancer (OR: 1.000123; 95% CI: 1.0000313-1.000215; P = .009). Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of our analysis results. Genetically predicted weight loss following RYGB has significant causal effects in reducing the risk of breast and lung cancer. It also has potential benefits in lowering the risk of hemotological cancers and increasing the risk of cervical cancer. Considering the limitations of our study, the reliability of its results and the underlying mechanisms require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.