Observational studyMedicine2025
Identification of DNA damage repair-related genes in sepsis using bioinformatics and machine learning: An observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening disease with a high mortality rate, for which the pathogenetic mechanism still unclear. DNA damage repair (DDR) is essential for maintaining genome integrity. This study aimed to explore the role of DDR-related genes in the development of sepsis and further investigated their molecular subtypes to enrich potential diagnostic biomarkers. Two Gene Expression Omnibus datasets (GSE65682 and GSE95233) were implemented to investigate the underlying role of DDR-related genes in sepsis. Three machine learning algorithms were utilized to identify the optimal feature genes. The diagnostic value of the selected genes was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curves. A nomogram was built to assess the diagnostic ability of the selected genes via "rms" package. Consensus clustering was subsequently performed to identify the molecular subtypes for sepsis. Furthermore, CIBERSORT was used to evaluate the immune cell infiltration of samples. Three different expressed DDR-related genes (GADD45A, HMGB2, and RPS27L) were identified as sepsis biomarkers. Receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that all 3 genes showed good diagnostic value. The nomogram including these 3 genes also exhibited good diagnostic efficiency. A notable difference in the immune microenvironment landscape was discovered between sepsis patients and healthy controls. Furthermore, all 3 genes were significantly associated with various immune cells. Our findings identify potential new diagnostic markers for sepsis that shed light on novel pathogenetic mechanism of sepsis and, therefore, may offer opportunities for potential intervention and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.