ArticleMedicine2025
Association of antibiotic use with rheumatoid arthritis: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous observational studies have suggested an association between antibiotic use and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), though the causal relationship remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal link between antibiotic use and RA in a European population using Mendelian randomization (MR). We utilized pooled genome-wide association study (GWAS) data on 12 antibiotics and RA from European populations, extracted from the GWAS Catalog. Both univariate MR and multivariate MR were employed to examine the causal relationship. Three analysis methods were applied: inverse variance weighting, MR-Egger, and weighted median, with inverse variance weighting as the primary method. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using Cochran Q statistics, MR-PRESSO, the MR-Egger intercept, and the leave-one-out test. Univariate MR revealed that tetracycline use was positively associated with RA (odds ratio = 1.013, 95% confidence interval = 1.001-1.024, P = .028), while none of the other 11 antibiotics exhibited a causal relationship with RA. However, further multivariate MR analysis found no causal association between tetracycline use and RA. Our results do not support a direct causal relationship between RA and antibiotic use, which may help alleviate some concerns among clinicians. Further MR studies are needed to validate these findings as additional datasets from other cohorts and GWASs with more detailed information become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.