ArticleMedicine2025
Septic cardiomyopathy or myocardial infarction?: A case report of septic shock with ST-segment elevation on ECG.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Diagnostic Dilemma: Urosepsis Mimicking ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleSepsis is one of the most prevalent and deadly diseases today. Sepsis involving the heart can progress to septic cardiomyopathy; however, there is a lack of uniform diagnostic criteria. A review of the literature reveals a paucity of literature on sepsis combined with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and no reports on emergency surgical treatment. PATIENTS CONCERNS: A 52-year-old patient with trauma-induced sepsis leading to acute heart failure with elevated ST-segment on electrocardiogram and postoperative coronary angiography suggestive of AMI. DIAGNOSES: Small bowel rupture, infectious shock, AMI, hypertensive disease, old cerebral infarction.
interventionsThe patient was admitted to the hospital and immediately underwent emergency surgery to remove the infected focus, with treatment with meropenem for anti-infection, ambroxol for sputum, parenteral nutritional support, sedation and analgesia, esmolol to control the ventricular rate, uradil to control blood pressure, and transfusion of red blood cells and plasma for correction of anemia and coagulation functions. Coronary angiography was performed 6 months later. OUTCOMES: The patient was discharged after showing signs of improvement and was subsequently monitored in an outpatient clinic setting. At the time of writing, the patient is still alive and well. LESSONS: In cases of acute heart failure resulting from trauma-induced sepsis, it is crucial to consider myocardial ischemia as a potential factor. Early surgical removal of infected foci may prove beneficial in improving the patient's prognosis. However, differentiating between septic cardiomyopathy and sepsis-combined myocardial infarction can be challenging, and the appropriateness of the diagnostic criteria for sepsis at this stage is debatable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.