Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39889140›Full record

ReviewRespiratory care2023

2022 Year in Review: Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation.

L Denise Willis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respiratory care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

L Denise WillisRespiratory Care Services, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas. WillisLD@archildrens.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual and mechanical cough augmentation techniques are used for airway clearance when cough effort is ineffective. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) has been a mainstay for respiratory complications of neuromuscular disorders, but its use has expanded to other conditions that result in respiratory muscle weakness and impaired cough, such as intubation and mechanical ventilation. Mechanical in-exsufflation has been used for cough augmentation in both adults and children but has been more widely evaluated in adults. Optimal settings for pressure and time are unknown. Newer MI-E devices have the option for oscillatory vibrations during therapy to facilitate secretion clearance. However, use of oscillations is not supported by the available evidence. Pressure settings and the interface used to administer MI-E influence peak expiratory flow generated during therapy. Laryngeal dysfunction can impact successful MI-E treatment in individuals with neuromuscular disorders and bulbar involvement. Transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy and videofluoroscopy may be helpful in assessing the laryngeal response and in customizing pressure settings to decrease the incidence of upper airway collapse during therapy. Electrical impedance tomography has been used for monitoring during mechanical ventilation and may have a role in assessing the effectiveness of MI-E. Much of the literature that supports MI-E is derived from small, single-center studies of adult populations. Future study is warranted for efficacy and optimization of MI-E therapy in various clinical applications.

Indexed as

cough assistanceCough augmentationhome careinvasive mechanical ventilationlaryngeal dysfunctionmechanical insufflation-exsufflationneuromuscular disorderpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID39889140
PMCPMC9994276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.