ReviewRespiratory care2023
2022 Year in Review: Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation.
Review in Respiratory care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative Anesthetic Management in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery: A Narrative Review with Focus on Neuromuscular Disorders.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Managing Cough in Pediatric Neuromuscular Disorders: Lung Function and Care Strategies.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Cough Peak Flow Assessment: Is There More to the Story?Respiratory care · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Manual and mechanical cough augmentation techniques are used for airway clearance when cough effort is ineffective. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) has been a mainstay for respiratory complications of neuromuscular disorders, but its use has expanded to other conditions that result in respiratory muscle weakness and impaired cough, such as intubation and mechanical ventilation. Mechanical in-exsufflation has been used for cough augmentation in both adults and children but has been more widely evaluated in adults. Optimal settings for pressure and time are unknown. Newer MI-E devices have the option for oscillatory vibrations during therapy to facilitate secretion clearance. However, use of oscillations is not supported by the available evidence. Pressure settings and the interface used to administer MI-E influence peak expiratory flow generated during therapy. Laryngeal dysfunction can impact successful MI-E treatment in individuals with neuromuscular disorders and bulbar involvement. Transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy and videofluoroscopy may be helpful in assessing the laryngeal response and in customizing pressure settings to decrease the incidence of upper airway collapse during therapy. Electrical impedance tomography has been used for monitoring during mechanical ventilation and may have a role in assessing the effectiveness of MI-E. Much of the literature that supports MI-E is derived from small, single-center studies of adult populations. Future study is warranted for efficacy and optimization of MI-E therapy in various clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.