ArticlePloS one2025
Computational and In silico study of novel fungicides against combating root rot, gray mold, fusarium wilt, and cereal rust.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- In-vitro and In-silico Evaluation of Supercritical Extract of Acacia Auriculiformis against Breast Cancer.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- In silico pharmacological analysis of Tinospora cordifolia compounds targeting African swine fever virus B175L.PloS one · 2026Article
- Understanding the role of oxylipins inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The exploration of potential candidates for fungicides against four fungal proteins that cause some vital plant diseases, namely Phytophthora capsici, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, and Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, was conducted using in silico, molecular docking simulations, and molecular dynamic (MD) simulation for selecting the nature of binding affinity with actives sites of proteins. First of all, the DFT was employed to optimize the molecular geometry, and get the prepared optimized ligand. From the DFT data, the chemical descriptors were calculated. Next, two docking tools, such as AutoDock by PyRx and Molecular Docking by Glide from the Schrödinger suite, were used to convey the docking score, and ligand protein interactions against four main proteases, for instance 7VEM, 8H6Q, 8EBB, and 7XDS having name of pathogens: Phytophthora capsici, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, and Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, respectively. In case of auto dock from PyRx, the fungicides L01, L03, L04, L13, L14, L17, L18, and L19 demonstrated significantly higher affinities for binding to the four fungal pathogens. Surprisingly, it is conveyed that the L03 illustrated the highest binding score against three of 7VEM, 8EBB, and 7XDS proteins and L09 is highest for 8H6Q. However, MD was performed to check the validation and calculation the docking procedure and stability of the protein ligand docked complex accounting of RMSD, RMSF, SASA, Radius of gyration (Rg), Protein secondary structure elements (SSE), Ramachandran plot which confirm that the stability of docked complex is so high, and number of calculating the hydrogen bonds is more than good enough, as a result it is concluded the docking procedure is valid. Finally, Difenoconazole (L03) has been considered as the most promising antifungal drug evaluated from the studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.