Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39888972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Computational and In silico study of novel fungicides against combating root rot, gray mold, fusarium wilt, and cereal rust.

Mollah Naimuzzaman, Md Mahabub Hasan, Ajoy Kumer, Abu Yousuf Hossin, Mohammad Harun-Ur-Rashid, Swapan Kumar Roy, Abu Noman Faruq Ahmmed, Jamal Uddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Understanding the role of oxylipins inFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mollah NaimuzzamanCollege of Agricultural Sciences, IUBAT-International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1161-6348
Md Mahabub HasanCollege of Agricultural Sciences, IUBAT-International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0009-0001-8990-3243
Ajoy KumerDepartment of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, IUBAT-International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-5136-6166
Abu Yousuf HossinCollege of Agricultural Sciences, IUBAT-International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-8168
Mohammad Harun-Ur-RashidDepartment of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, IUBAT-International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1883-4620
Swapan Kumar RoyCollege of Agricultural Sciences, IUBAT-International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-3837-4011
Abu Noman Faruq AhmmedDepartment of Plant Pathology, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1784-6558
Jamal UddinDepartment of Natural Sciences, Center for Nanotechnology, Coppin State University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exploration of potential candidates for fungicides against four fungal proteins that cause some vital plant diseases, namely Phytophthora capsici, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, and Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, was conducted using in silico, molecular docking simulations, and molecular dynamic (MD) simulation for selecting the nature of binding affinity with actives sites of proteins. First of all, the DFT was employed to optimize the molecular geometry, and get the prepared optimized ligand. From the DFT data, the chemical descriptors were calculated. Next, two docking tools, such as AutoDock by PyRx and Molecular Docking by Glide from the Schrödinger suite, were used to convey the docking score, and ligand protein interactions against four main proteases, for instance 7VEM, 8H6Q, 8EBB, and 7XDS having name of pathogens: Phytophthora capsici, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, and Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, respectively. In case of auto dock from PyRx, the fungicides L01, L03, L04, L13, L14, L17, L18, and L19 demonstrated significantly higher affinities for binding to the four fungal pathogens. Surprisingly, it is conveyed that the L03 illustrated the highest binding score against three of 7VEM, 8EBB, and 7XDS proteins and L09 is highest for 8H6Q. However, MD was performed to check the validation and calculation the docking procedure and stability of the protein ligand docked complex accounting of RMSD, RMSF, SASA, Radius of gyration (Rg), Protein secondary structure elements (SSE), Ramachandran plot which confirm that the stability of docked complex is so high, and number of calculating the hydrogen bonds is more than good enough, as a result it is concluded the docking procedure is valid. Finally, Difenoconazole (L03) has been considered as the most promising antifungal drug evaluated from the studies.

Indexed as

Fungicides, IndustrialFusariumPlant DiseasesBasidiomycotaBotrytisComputer SimulationFungal ProteinsMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationPhytophthoraPlant RootsFungal ProteinsFungicides, Industrial

Identifiers

PMID39888972
PMCPMC11785347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.